Skip to main content

Solid parsimony at West Brom

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the latest accounts of West Bromwich Albion. The club swung from £23m pre-tax loss to a small £0.1m profit, as revenue almost doubled from £54m to £107m following promotion to the Premier League, though profit on player sales fell £25m to £4m and operating expenses rose £4m (4%) in the top flight.   WBA were one of only five Premier League clubs to report a pre-tax profit in 2020/21.

Before last season’s small surplus the Baggies had posted three consecutive losses, amounting to £37m. However, traditionally West Brom have been quite prudent financially, making money every season from 2010 to 2017. Indeed, they had the seventh highest profits in PL in last 10 years.

Revenue

Main driver of the£53m revenue increase was broadcasting, up £56m from £41m to £97m, due to the more lucrative Premier League TV deal, though commercial also grew £2m (21%) to £10m. This offset the COVID driven reduction in gate receipts, down £4.8m (98%) to just £74k.

Commercial income rose £1.8m (21%) to £10.1m, thanks to higher sponsorship. However, a fair bit lower than £15.3m peak in 2018, due to COVID and only 11 months.   This was the smallest in the top flight, just below Burnley. For more context,  it was over a quarter of billion less than Manchester City £272m.

Despite the growth following promotion, revenue was still £31m (22%) lower than the Premier League high of £138m in 2017, largely due to less central TV distributions, though there were also falls in gate receipts £7m and commercial £2m (mainly because of COVID).  In fact, the £107m revenue was comfortably the lowest in the Premier League, a fair way below Burnley and Sheffield United £115m and less than a fifth of Man City £570m.

Player transfers

Profit from player sales fell £25m from £29m to £4m, mainly Oliver Burke to Sheffield United and Jonathan Leko to Birmingham City. One of the smallest player trading results in the Premier League.  Like many other clubs, the Baggies have become increasingly reliant on player sales with £63m profit in the last 5 years compared to only £27m in the preceding 5-year period, though still on low side for PL. Sold players for £19m after these accounts, mainly Matheus Pereira to Al Hilal.

Although the club maintained gross transfer spend in their two years in the Championship, high player disposals meant that they had net sales in this period. Following promotion to the Premier League, they returned to £35m net spend.    However, the club have spent very little since relegation, as many players have arrived on free transfers or loans. In fact, of the teams playing in the 2020/21 Premier League, West Brom had the third lowest gross spend in the last five years, only above Burnley and Sheffield United

As West Brom were relegated after just one season in the Premier League, they only get two years of parachutes (instead of the full three years). Details not published for 2020/21, but in 2019/20 a relegated club received £42m in year one and £34m in year two.

Average attendance of 24,053 in 2019/20 (for games played with fans) would have placed them firmly in the bottom half of the Premier League, though crowds held up pretty well after relegation to the Championship.

Wages

Wages up £10m (15%) from £67m to £77m, though growth restricted as prior year included large promotion bonus. It’s also a bit misleading, as accounting period changing from 13 months to 11 months. On a like-for-like basis, the increase would be £22m (36%) from £62m to £84m.  £67m wage bill was the second smallest in the Premier League, only ahead of Sheffield United £57m. While the club could be commended for its tight cost control, the flip side is that low wages made relegation more likely (though survival would have triggered a bonus payment).

The wages to turnover ratio fell from 124% in the Championship to 72% in the Premier League. This was mid-table, though I calculate it would have been 78% if adjusted for the 11 months’ accounts, which would have been one of the highest in the top flight.

Debt

Gross debt in the football club decreased from £24m to £19m, all owed to the owners (unsecured, no fixed repayment date) with no external debt. The club’s holding company, West Bromwich Albion Holdings Limited, has zero financial debt.   £19m gross debt was one the lowest in the Premier League.  Loans provided by the owners are interest-free, which gives them a slight competitive advantage against many other clubs who have to pay interest on their loans.

In the last 9 years the Baggies have been largely self-sustaining, generating an impressive £137m from operations, supplemented by £17m of owner loans. Of this, £101m was spent on players (net), £27m on an inter-company dividend in 2016, £12m tax and £10m capex.   Only £17m owner funding has been provided in the last 10 years, which was one of the lowest in the Premier League. In fact, the club actually loaned £5m (£4.95m plus £50k interest) to Wisdom Smart Corporation Ltd, a related party to controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai, as the COVID pandemic saw his “international business suffer”, which is hardly comforting to Baggies’ fans.

The club said they “maintained a solid financial position”, which is true, though the loans to the owner do leave a bad taste in the mouth. Lai is “confident” that the club will be able to compete for promotion from the Championship this coming season, but fans may not be so sure.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/