Skip to main content

Slump in United's value

Manchester United's value has slumped by more than £260m in the decade since the Glazer family sold 10 per cent of their shares on the New York Stock Exchange.  It is exactly ten years since the club was listed in New York and the Glazers have taken more than £100m in dividends since then.

The share price on Tuesday evening was 19 per cent lower than when it was launched.  On the basis of the value of the shares, United's overall value had dropped from £2.2 billion in 2012 to about $1.88 billion.  (This does not take account of inflation at an average of 1.7 per cent a year in the UK).  In the same period the share price of Juventus has doubled.

Football finance guru Kieran Maguire reckons that the low price reflects investors having a negative view about the management of the club from the owners downwards.  'If you are that far below your launch price a decade later then that must be a reflection on how the market perceives the quality of management', he told The Times.

Maguire notes: 'If you had invested £1,000 in Manchester United shares that day on 10th anniversary they're worth £814. Same amount invested in Juventus is worth £2,000, F1 £2,564, Atlanta Braves £1,585.'

Until the pandemic United delivered profits almost every year, as well as setting the bar in terms of commercial growth.  The failures on the pitch have not been down to a lack of investment in players.  In terms of net expenditure, United have spent £1 billion since 2013, only just short of Manchester City and more than Chelsea's £735m.

However, income from player sales has been well below their rivals - £400m at United, £500m at City and £735m at Chelsea.

Maguire believes that the Glazers may have banked on a Super League or something like Project Big Picture to fund investment at Old Trafford.

As it is, the club will have to take on more debt to fund the expansion of the stadium to 90,000 seats.  this will mean taking on more debt, but Maguire points out that Tottenham have shown the value of taking on debt to improve a stadium.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/