Skip to main content

Sound finances at Bayern

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the finances of Bayern Munich.  Despite the significant impact of COVID, the club “achieved sound financial results”, once again posting a pre-tax profit, though down from €17m to €5m (€2m after tax). Revenue (club definition) fell €54m (8%) from €698m to €644m, largely offset by €42m cut in expenses.

Bayern were one of only three clubs in the Bundesliga to post a profit in 2020/21, due to “sensible management and not spending more than we earn”, though their €5m was just below RB Leipzig’s €8m. Some clubs lost a huge amount of money, especially Hertha €78m.  In fact, the Bavarians have now been profitable for an amazing 29 years in a row, generating €241m pre-tax profit in the 4 years before COVID.

For the second year in a row Bayern retained 3rd place in the Deloitte Money League in 2021, with their €611m revenue only surpassed by Manchester City €645m and Real Madrid €641m.

At €5m Bayern were one of a small number of European clubs that were profitable in 2020/21, along with Man City €6m and Real Madrid €2m. In stark contrast, other clubs had some staggering losses, including Juventus €208m, PSG €225m, Inter €239m and especially Barcelona €555m.

The income from player sales almost halved, falling from €64m to €33m, mainly Thiago’s move to Liverpool. This was partly due to the transfer market being depressed by COVID, though some clubs still made good money from player trading, e.g. Real Madrid €106m and Man City €77m.

Like many clubs Bayern have become increasingly reliant on player trading. Although income fell to €33m in 2021, they earned an impressive €154m in the previous 2 years. Few big money sales in 2021/22 (Alaba left on a free), but this season was better.

The revenue gap between Bayern and Borussia Dortmund has narrowed in recent years, but was still as much as €274m in 2021. Put another way, Bayern’s €611m revenue was nearly 80% higher than Dortmund’s €338m, which is a huge difference between first and second ranked clubs in a country.

Commercial income fell €15m (4%) from €360m to €345m, though the small decrease was a pretty good performance during the pandemic. In fact, this was the highest commercial revenue in Europe, ahead of PSG €337m, Real Madrid €322m.

Broadcasting revenue rose €51m (25%) to €255m, a club record for this revenue stream, mainly from UEFA TV money, up €54m to €136m, due to income deferred for games played after 2019/20 accounting close. Still far below Man City €336m, due to low Bundesliga TV money.

The wage bill rose €33m (10%) from €340m to €373m, which means that wages have risen by €108m (41%) since 2017. One reason for the increase in 2021 was the players taking a voluntary salary cut in the previous season.   These were by far the highest wages in Germany.

Baern enjoy a major competitive advantage in Germany, as their €373m wage bill is a hefty €158m (73%) more than Borussia Dortmund €216m, the highest ever gap. This difference is much higher than a similar comparison in England, Spain and Italy, only smaller than PSG’s lead in France.

wages to turnover ratio increased (worsened) from 54% to 61%, obviously impacted by COVID revenue losses, though this was still one of the best figures in Europe, only behind Tottenham Hostpur 57% and Real Madrid 58%, but miles better than the likes of PSG 88%. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/