Skip to main content

Will Spurs do a naming rights deal with Google?

It is now three and a half years since Tottenham Hotspur moved into their new home, a £1billion state-of-the-art stadium built on top of the old White Hart Lane.  Chairman Daniel Levy confirmed back in 2019 that the club would be interested in securing a “naming-rights deal” with the “right brand, on the right money”,  but no such agreement has been struck.

The pandemic held things up.   There has also been a suggestion that Tottenham wanted to keep the stadium free from a sponsor as it might be more attractive for a potential buyer.  A further factor is that Uefa have sponsorship regulations that forbid the stadium being referred to by its sponsor but for certain circumstances. Therefore, for example, Emirates Stadium is known as Arsenal Stadium in Uefa competitions.

The north London club have been looking for a long-term deal worth more than £25 million a year and have spoken to a number of big companies including Uber, FedEx and Amazon during the three years since they moved into their new home.

Reports in more than one media outlet have suggested that Tottenham are in meaningful talks with Google over naming rights for the 62,850-capacity stadium.

Tottenham’s stadium holds obvious appeal. As well as hosting the club’s home matches in the Premier League and Champions League — two of the most-watched football tournaments in the world — the ground also stages regular NFL matches and could yet welcome a permanent franchise in the future. The stadium has also hosted rugby league’s Challenge Cup Final, heavyweight boxing world title fights and several large concerts.

Any deal with Google would be a coup for Tottenham. The club’s average annual turnover is the fifth-best in the Premier League and Spurs already have lucrative long-term arrangements with its main shirt sponsor AIA, kit supplier Nike, plus a sleeve partnership with online car seller Cinch. But striking a naming-rights deal would boost their coffers further when things are going better on the pitch.

Although no agreement with Google is close, it would be an interesting step for the technology company to align themselves with one club as opposed to a league. They have agreements with the NBA and the MLB in the United States although in March they announced a multi-year partnership with McLaren Racing as a new partner of the Formula 1 Team and the MX Extreme E Team for this season.

Another stumbling block has been the club’s financial demands which would make their deal among the biggest in the world. The highest naming rights deal was made by Scotiabank for Toronto’s Maple Leafs and Raptors Arena in 2018, worth Canadian $800 million (about £527 million), or £26 million a year. Social Finance agreed to a 20-year deal worth a total of $400 million (£361 million in total or 18 million a year) to place their name on the Los Angeles Rams and Chargers’ new home in 2019.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...