Skip to main content

Will Spurs do a naming rights deal with Google?

It is now three and a half years since Tottenham Hotspur moved into their new home, a £1billion state-of-the-art stadium built on top of the old White Hart Lane.  Chairman Daniel Levy confirmed back in 2019 that the club would be interested in securing a “naming-rights deal” with the “right brand, on the right money”,  but no such agreement has been struck.

The pandemic held things up.   There has also been a suggestion that Tottenham wanted to keep the stadium free from a sponsor as it might be more attractive for a potential buyer.  A further factor is that Uefa have sponsorship regulations that forbid the stadium being referred to by its sponsor but for certain circumstances. Therefore, for example, Emirates Stadium is known as Arsenal Stadium in Uefa competitions.

The north London club have been looking for a long-term deal worth more than £25 million a year and have spoken to a number of big companies including Uber, FedEx and Amazon during the three years since they moved into their new home.

Reports in more than one media outlet have suggested that Tottenham are in meaningful talks with Google over naming rights for the 62,850-capacity stadium.

Tottenham’s stadium holds obvious appeal. As well as hosting the club’s home matches in the Premier League and Champions League — two of the most-watched football tournaments in the world — the ground also stages regular NFL matches and could yet welcome a permanent franchise in the future. The stadium has also hosted rugby league’s Challenge Cup Final, heavyweight boxing world title fights and several large concerts.

Any deal with Google would be a coup for Tottenham. The club’s average annual turnover is the fifth-best in the Premier League and Spurs already have lucrative long-term arrangements with its main shirt sponsor AIA, kit supplier Nike, plus a sleeve partnership with online car seller Cinch. But striking a naming-rights deal would boost their coffers further when things are going better on the pitch.

Although no agreement with Google is close, it would be an interesting step for the technology company to align themselves with one club as opposed to a league. They have agreements with the NBA and the MLB in the United States although in March they announced a multi-year partnership with McLaren Racing as a new partner of the Formula 1 Team and the MX Extreme E Team for this season.

Another stumbling block has been the club’s financial demands which would make their deal among the biggest in the world. The highest naming rights deal was made by Scotiabank for Toronto’s Maple Leafs and Raptors Arena in 2018, worth Canadian $800 million (about £527 million), or £26 million a year. Social Finance agreed to a 20-year deal worth a total of $400 million (£361 million in total or 18 million a year) to place their name on the Los Angeles Rams and Chargers’ new home in 2019.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl