Skip to main content

Will Spurs do a naming rights deal with Google?

It is now three and a half years since Tottenham Hotspur moved into their new home, a £1billion state-of-the-art stadium built on top of the old White Hart Lane.  Chairman Daniel Levy confirmed back in 2019 that the club would be interested in securing a “naming-rights deal” with the “right brand, on the right money”,  but no such agreement has been struck.

The pandemic held things up.   There has also been a suggestion that Tottenham wanted to keep the stadium free from a sponsor as it might be more attractive for a potential buyer.  A further factor is that Uefa have sponsorship regulations that forbid the stadium being referred to by its sponsor but for certain circumstances. Therefore, for example, Emirates Stadium is known as Arsenal Stadium in Uefa competitions.

The north London club have been looking for a long-term deal worth more than £25 million a year and have spoken to a number of big companies including Uber, FedEx and Amazon during the three years since they moved into their new home.

Reports in more than one media outlet have suggested that Tottenham are in meaningful talks with Google over naming rights for the 62,850-capacity stadium.

Tottenham’s stadium holds obvious appeal. As well as hosting the club’s home matches in the Premier League and Champions League — two of the most-watched football tournaments in the world — the ground also stages regular NFL matches and could yet welcome a permanent franchise in the future. The stadium has also hosted rugby league’s Challenge Cup Final, heavyweight boxing world title fights and several large concerts.

Any deal with Google would be a coup for Tottenham. The club’s average annual turnover is the fifth-best in the Premier League and Spurs already have lucrative long-term arrangements with its main shirt sponsor AIA, kit supplier Nike, plus a sleeve partnership with online car seller Cinch. But striking a naming-rights deal would boost their coffers further when things are going better on the pitch.

Although no agreement with Google is close, it would be an interesting step for the technology company to align themselves with one club as opposed to a league. They have agreements with the NBA and the MLB in the United States although in March they announced a multi-year partnership with McLaren Racing as a new partner of the Formula 1 Team and the MX Extreme E Team for this season.

Another stumbling block has been the club’s financial demands which would make their deal among the biggest in the world. The highest naming rights deal was made by Scotiabank for Toronto’s Maple Leafs and Raptors Arena in 2018, worth Canadian $800 million (about £527 million), or £26 million a year. Social Finance agreed to a 20-year deal worth a total of $400 million (£361 million in total or 18 million a year) to place their name on the Los Angeles Rams and Chargers’ new home in 2019.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do