Skip to main content

No Premier League owners have taken out more money than the Glazers

The authoritative Swiss Ramble review the latest quarterly accounts of Manchester United: https://swissramble.substack.com/p/manchester-united-finances-q1-202223?utm_source=substack&publication_id=1203438&post_id=89847265&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&triggerShare=true&isFreemail=true

This is the third year in a row that Manchester United have reported a pre-tax loss in Q1. It is worth noting that last season’s £20m loss in Q1 ultimately became a £150m loss for the full year.

The difference in United’s earnings in seasons where they qualify for the Champions League is stark. As an example, they earned £68m in 2021/22 for reaching the last 16 in Europe’s premier tournament, but only £26m in 2019/20 even though they got to the Europa League semi-final.

There was clearly scope for a reduction in wages, as United’s £384m in 2021/22 was comfortably the highest in the top flight.  In fact, this was the highest ever wage bill in the Premier League, despite United only finishing 6th and missing out on the Champions League.

in the 16 years since the Glazers’ arrival in 2005 up to 2021, Manchester United’s £725m interest payment was nearly three times as much as the next highest club, namely Arsenal with £251m.  Looked at another way, it was very nearly as much as the rest of the Premier League combined, which added up to £749m.

No owners in the Premier League have taken out more money than the Glazers. As an example, in the 10 years up to 2021 United paid £154m to their owners (mainly the Glazers), while others have put significant funds into their clubs, e.g. Manchester City £684m, Chelsea £516m and Aston Villa £506m.

The club continues to spend big in the transfer market, but much of this has been funded by increases in debt in the shape of higher drawdowns from the bank and record transfer debt. Potential investors into United would do well to take a close look at their finances, including their exposure to currency movements and higher interest rates.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/