Skip to main content

Don't knock Glazers United bidders told

Bidders for Manchester United have been told to stop running public campaigns which could damage the Glazer family following the official start of the race to take control of the club.

A statement from the Qatar bid in particular is understood to have caused consternation among those running the process, with the promise to return United to its “former glories” seen as implied criticism of the present owners.

The confirmed bidders are a group led by Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad bin Jaber Al Thani, chairman of one of the Emirate’s biggest banks and Ineos, fronted by British billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe. It is understood there is no bid from Saudi Arabia despite initial interest.

On Friday, the Qatari bid issued a detailed statement outlining plans that were clearly designed to appeal to supporters critical of the Glazer regime. This included the declaration that it would be a “completely debt free” purchase following the controversies of the Glazers’ leveraged buyout.

The Qatar bid was not alone in issuing a statement timed to coincide with Friday’s 10pm UK time “soft deadline” for opening bids. The Ineos bid issued its own statement on Saturday morning in which it talked of “putting the Manchester back into Manchester United” while investing “to make them the number one club in the world once again”.

The Times understands that has prompted Raine, the New York bank managing the sale for the Glazers, to firmly remind bidders that the process is meant to be private, having been required to sign comprehensive non-disclosure agreements as part of the process.

It is not yet clear how many other groups have entered the race to buy United. The main rivals to the Qatari and Ratcliffe bids are expected to be private equity funds in the United States, with The Sunday Times reporting that US hedge fund Elliott is linked to one offer.   This could be a bid for a minority stake or to fund other bidders.

Both known bids are thought to value United somewhere between £4 billion and £5 billion, which the Glazers will hope to drive up. While the Qatari bid is for the entire club, Ratcliffe’s Ineos offer is for “majority ownership” by purchasing the Glazers’ 69 per cent stake, including the Class B shares which carry the majority of the voting rights. Ratcliffe’s group could then seek to pick up the rest of the shares once they have control.

United’s debt is understood to be around £570 million and the Qatari bid claims it would immediately wipe the whole amount off the books. Ineos has spoken to banks including JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs about possible support, though the petrochemicals company insists that it will not load any fresh debt onto the club and is seeking to run the club as a successful sporting enterprise rather than a business.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/