Skip to main content

How much did Chelsea really spend?

The authoritative Swiss Ramble uses his analytical skills to answer this question: https://swissramble.substack.com/p/how-much-money-did-chelsea-really

Chelsea ended up spending an incredible £286m in the January transfer window, which takes their total spend for the 2022/23 season to £539m.

In fact, if we include transfer add-ons and the £10m loan fee to secure the services of Joao Felix for six months, the outlay in January was £327m with the expenditure for the full season being £603m. Adding the £63m committed to purchase Christopher Nkunku from RB Leipzig in the summer would give a spooky £666m.

It seems like ages ago now, but only this summer Chelsea spent another quarter of a billion pounds, including the big money buys of Wesley Fofana, Marc Cucurella, Raheem Sterling and Kalidou Koulibaly – many of whom now find themselves on the bench.

To place Chelsea’s expenditure into perspective, it was £180m more than the rest of the Big Six combined.  Chelsea on their own spent far more than La Liga, the Bundesliga, Serie A and Ligue 1 put together.

Chelsea’s business model over the past few years owes a great deal to the accounting treatment for player trading, as it has essentially been to offset large operating losses with profits from player sales.

In total, the Swiss Ramble estimates that Chelsea’s signings this season have committed the club to around £1.3 bln, due to a combination of the high spend and lengthy contracts. That is an expensive gamble – unless the players deliver on the pitch.

One of the key reasons for Chelsea’s major investment is to improve their chances of qualifying for the Champions League. This will be a big ask this season, as they currently sit in 9th place in the Premier League, a full 10 points behind the top four.   Europe has been an important contributor towards Chelsea’s revenue, especially 2020 when they earned £106m by defeating Manchester City to win the Champions League.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/