Skip to main content

End of parachute payments hit Stoke revenues

Stoke City made a £29m loss from day to day operations in 21/22, down from £46m the previous year but player sale profits reduced this by £10m, reports Kieran Maguire.  A loan from Bet365 of £120m that was never going to be repaid has been formally agreed as never going to be repaid.

Excluding the unusual stadium sale profits and debt write off the club has made operating losses over the years of £233 million.

Stoke spent £35m more than they generated in 21/22 from day to day running of the club. This was effectively funded by reducing the club’s cash balance.

Revenue down £10m as increase in matchday and hospitality could not offset end of parachute payments.

Wages down 26% as Premier League contracts expire. Average wage now just £17,300 a week.  Wages were £120 for every £100 of income [a high figure, but not unusual in the Championship].

Stoke bought players for £5.9m. Players who originally cost £81m left at end of contract or were sold for £15m.  Club has not signed any players for fees in 22/22 but has sold players for £18.5m.

Club has no external debt and now owes Bet365 just £90m.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/