Did Watford spend enough last season?

Watford’s pre-tax loss slightly reduced from £19m to £16m in 2021/22. Revenue shot up £71m from £57m to £128m following promotion to the Premier League, but profit on player sales fell £41m from £56m to £15m, operating expenses rose £23m (18%) and net interest payable increased £2m (34%) to £7m.

Watford have now posted losses in four out of the last five seasons, even though they spent all but one of them in the Premier League. Their total loss over this period amounted to £92m, but there is a crumb of comfort in the fact that losses have now reduced two years in a row.

The main driver of Watford’s £71m revenue growth was broadcasting, up £35m (71%) from £50m to £85m, due to the more lucrative Premier League deal, though commercial also grew an incredible £32m from £4m to a club record £36m. \yhere is some doubt over whether this also includes an element from the Premier League TV deal.

Although losing money is rarely good news, Watford’s £16m loss was actually one of the better financial performances in the 2021/22 Premier League. Many clubs reported much higher losses last season, including Manchester United £150m, Chelsea £121m, Leicester City £92m, Newcastle United £73m and Tottenham £61m.

Watford made £15m profit from player sales, mainly from Cucho Hernandez to Columbus Crew and Will Hughes to Crystal Palace. This was significantly lower than the previous season’s £56m profit, when they made many sales, partly in an attempt to balance the books in the Championship, partly because players wanted to leave after relegation.

Watford’s business model has become more reliant on player sales, as they have make £111m profit from this activity in the last four years, which was more than twice as much as their £55m profit in the preceding 9-year period. In fact, Watford had the sixth highest profits from player sales in the Premier League in the last four years (for clubs competing in the top flight in 2021/22). They were only behind Chelsea, Manchester City, Leicester City, Everton and Liverpool.

Watford’s bottom line has often been hit by the cost of termination payments for sacked managers. In 2021/22 this increased from £2.2m to £7.8m, following the departures of Xisco, Ranieri and Hodgson. The previous season featured payouts to Nigel Pearson and Vladimir Ivic, while 2019/20 included £6.7m for Javi Gracia and Quique Sanchez Flores. This season will presumably include yet more pay-offs to Edwards and Bilic.

Wages were much smaller than the last time the club were in the Premier League in 2019/20, when they paid £96m. This was also Watford’s lowest in the top flight since 2016/17. For some context, Watford’s wages were only around a fifth of Manchester United’s £384m.

Watford’s 62% wages to turnover ratio was one of the better wages to turnover ratios in the Premier League for clubs outside the Big Six (who benefit from much higher revenue). That said, Hornets fans might have preferred to see more of the club’s money on the pitch, which might have avoided the immediate relegation.

Watford only spent £24m on player purchases, the lowest in the Premier League in 2021/22, miles below the likes of Aston Villa £204m, Arsenal £188m and Tottenham £160m. Watford’s £24m player purchases in 2021/22 was actually one of the lowest in the first season in the Premier League for promoted clubs, much less than the likes of Nottingham Forest and Aston Villa (both above £150m). The club would no doubt argue that this was not required after only one season out of the top flight, but this clearly harmed their chances of survival. Interestingly, Watford’s £24m gross spend in the Premier League was only £3m more than their £21m outlay in the Championship the previous season

Watford’s £125m gross debt was the 8th largest in the Premier League, only just below Liverpool £159m. This is a relatively large amount of debt for a club of Watford’s size, around 100% of their turnover (in the top flight).

The £65m owner funding in the last five years is not that high for the Premier League. In that period, owners at five clubs have put in more than £200m, led by Everton £574m, Chelsea £416m and Aston Villa £351m.

Scott Duxbury said that promotion into the Premier League was the club’s goal, but this is now out of reach. From an outsider’s perspective, the constant changing of manager seems counter-productive. The fans’ patience with the owner has been severely tested in the last couple of years. It is debatable whether this seemingly broken relationship can be mended.

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog