Skip to main content

Did Watford spend enough last season?

Watford’s pre-tax loss slightly reduced from £19m to £16m in 2021/22. Revenue shot up £71m from £57m to £128m following promotion to the Premier League, but profit on player sales fell £41m from £56m to £15m, operating expenses rose £23m (18%) and net interest payable increased £2m (34%) to £7m.

Watford have now posted losses in four out of the last five seasons, even though they spent all but one of them in the Premier League. Their total loss over this period amounted to £92m, but there is a crumb of comfort in the fact that losses have now reduced two years in a row.

The main driver of Watford’s £71m revenue growth was broadcasting, up £35m (71%) from £50m to £85m, due to the more lucrative Premier League deal, though commercial also grew an incredible £32m from £4m to a club record £36m.  \yhere is some doubt over whether this also includes an element from the Premier League TV deal.

Although losing money is rarely good news, Watford’s £16m loss was actually one of the better financial performances in the 2021/22 Premier League. Many clubs reported much higher losses last season, including Manchester United £150m, Chelsea £121m, Leicester City £92m, Newcastle United £73m and Tottenham £61m.

Watford made £15m profit from player sales, mainly from Cucho Hernandez to Columbus Crew and Will Hughes to Crystal Palace.  This was significantly lower than the previous season’s £56m profit, when they made many sales, partly in an attempt to balance the books in the Championship, partly because players wanted to leave after relegation.

Watford’s business model has become more reliant on player sales, as they have make £111m profit from this activity in the last four years, which was more than twice as much as their £55m profit in the preceding 9-year period.   In fact, Watford had the sixth highest profits from player sales in the Premier League in the last four years (for clubs competing in the top flight in 2021/22). They were only behind Chelsea, Manchester City, Leicester City, Everton and Liverpool.

Watford’s bottom line has often been hit by the cost of termination payments for sacked managers. In 2021/22 this increased from £2.2m to £7.8m, following the departures of Xisco, Ranieri and Hodgson.  The previous season featured payouts to Nigel Pearson and Vladimir Ivic, while 2019/20 included £6.7m for Javi Gracia and Quique Sanchez Flores. This season will presumably include yet more pay-offs to Edwards and Bilic.

Wages were much smaller than the last time the club were in the Premier League in 2019/20, when they paid £96m. This was also Watford’s lowest in the top flight since 2016/17.   For some context, Watford’s wages were only around a fifth of Manchester United’s £384m.

Watford’s 62% wages to turnover ratio was one of the better wages to turnover ratios in the Premier League for clubs outside the Big Six (who benefit from much higher revenue). That said, Hornets fans might have preferred to see more of the club’s money on the pitch, which might have avoided the immediate relegation.

Watford only spent £24m on player purchases, the lowest in the Premier League in 2021/22, miles below the likes of Aston Villa £204m, Arsenal £188m and Tottenham £160m.  Watford’s £24m player purchases in 2021/22 was actually one of the lowest in the first season in the Premier League for promoted clubs, much less than the likes of Nottingham Forest and Aston Villa (both above £150m).  The club would no doubt argue that this was not required after only one season out of the top flight, but this clearly harmed their chances of survival.   Interestingly, Watford’s £24m gross spend in the Premier League was only £3m more than their £21m outlay in the Championship the previous season

Watford’s £125m gross debt was the 8th largest in the Premier League, only just below Liverpool £159m. This is a relatively large amount of debt for a club of Watford’s size, around 100% of their turnover (in the top flight).

The £65m owner funding in the last five years is not that high for the Premier League. In that period, owners at five clubs have put in more than £200m, led by Everton £574m, Chelsea £416m and Aston Villa £351m.

Scott Duxbury said that promotion into the Premier League was the club’s goal, but this is now out of reach. From an outsider’s perspective, the constant changing of manager seems counter-productive.  The fans’ patience with the owner has been severely tested in the last couple of years. It is debatable whether this seemingly broken relationship can be mended.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/