Skip to main content

Did Watford spend enough last season?

Watford’s pre-tax loss slightly reduced from £19m to £16m in 2021/22. Revenue shot up £71m from £57m to £128m following promotion to the Premier League, but profit on player sales fell £41m from £56m to £15m, operating expenses rose £23m (18%) and net interest payable increased £2m (34%) to £7m.

Watford have now posted losses in four out of the last five seasons, even though they spent all but one of them in the Premier League. Their total loss over this period amounted to £92m, but there is a crumb of comfort in the fact that losses have now reduced two years in a row.

The main driver of Watford’s £71m revenue growth was broadcasting, up £35m (71%) from £50m to £85m, due to the more lucrative Premier League deal, though commercial also grew an incredible £32m from £4m to a club record £36m.  \yhere is some doubt over whether this also includes an element from the Premier League TV deal.

Although losing money is rarely good news, Watford’s £16m loss was actually one of the better financial performances in the 2021/22 Premier League. Many clubs reported much higher losses last season, including Manchester United £150m, Chelsea £121m, Leicester City £92m, Newcastle United £73m and Tottenham £61m.

Watford made £15m profit from player sales, mainly from Cucho Hernandez to Columbus Crew and Will Hughes to Crystal Palace.  This was significantly lower than the previous season’s £56m profit, when they made many sales, partly in an attempt to balance the books in the Championship, partly because players wanted to leave after relegation.

Watford’s business model has become more reliant on player sales, as they have make £111m profit from this activity in the last four years, which was more than twice as much as their £55m profit in the preceding 9-year period.   In fact, Watford had the sixth highest profits from player sales in the Premier League in the last four years (for clubs competing in the top flight in 2021/22). They were only behind Chelsea, Manchester City, Leicester City, Everton and Liverpool.

Watford’s bottom line has often been hit by the cost of termination payments for sacked managers. In 2021/22 this increased from £2.2m to £7.8m, following the departures of Xisco, Ranieri and Hodgson.  The previous season featured payouts to Nigel Pearson and Vladimir Ivic, while 2019/20 included £6.7m for Javi Gracia and Quique Sanchez Flores. This season will presumably include yet more pay-offs to Edwards and Bilic.

Wages were much smaller than the last time the club were in the Premier League in 2019/20, when they paid £96m. This was also Watford’s lowest in the top flight since 2016/17.   For some context, Watford’s wages were only around a fifth of Manchester United’s £384m.

Watford’s 62% wages to turnover ratio was one of the better wages to turnover ratios in the Premier League for clubs outside the Big Six (who benefit from much higher revenue). That said, Hornets fans might have preferred to see more of the club’s money on the pitch, which might have avoided the immediate relegation.

Watford only spent £24m on player purchases, the lowest in the Premier League in 2021/22, miles below the likes of Aston Villa £204m, Arsenal £188m and Tottenham £160m.  Watford’s £24m player purchases in 2021/22 was actually one of the lowest in the first season in the Premier League for promoted clubs, much less than the likes of Nottingham Forest and Aston Villa (both above £150m).  The club would no doubt argue that this was not required after only one season out of the top flight, but this clearly harmed their chances of survival.   Interestingly, Watford’s £24m gross spend in the Premier League was only £3m more than their £21m outlay in the Championship the previous season

Watford’s £125m gross debt was the 8th largest in the Premier League, only just below Liverpool £159m. This is a relatively large amount of debt for a club of Watford’s size, around 100% of their turnover (in the top flight).

The £65m owner funding in the last five years is not that high for the Premier League. In that period, owners at five clubs have put in more than £200m, led by Everton £574m, Chelsea £416m and Aston Villa £351m.

Scott Duxbury said that promotion into the Premier League was the club’s goal, but this is now out of reach. From an outsider’s perspective, the constant changing of manager seems counter-productive.  The fans’ patience with the owner has been severely tested in the last couple of years. It is debatable whether this seemingly broken relationship can be mended.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do