Skip to main content

Has Ratcliffe moved ahead in United bid battle?

Sir Jim Ratcliffe and Ineos may have moved ahead in the battle to buy Manchester United after valuing the club higher than their main Qatari rivals.

Although Ratcliffe is seeking to buy only the 69 per cent stake that belongs to the Glazers — and in one proposal is open to Joel and Avram Glazer retaining a stake if he still has full control of the club — it is understood that the offer he submitted before Friday’s 10pm deadline for the third and final bids equates to more than that tabled by the group led by Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad al-Thani, and that Ineos is the only bidder to have valued the club higher than £5 billion.

On Friday evening, sources close to the Qataris said that Sheikh Jassim’s offer was marginally in excess of £5 billion, with a pledge to provide additional investment in the club’s infrastructure as well as playing staff. However, insiders with knowledge of the process have queried that value and suggested that the Qataris have not submitted an offer of additional funds on top of their bid.

At this stage three American investment firms — namely Elliott Management, The Carlyle Group and Ares Management — should not be discounted even if they are only offering to buy a minority stake that would enable the Glazers to refurbish Old Trafford and the club’s training ground.

It is anticipated that a preferred bidder will be granted a period of exclusivity in the next ten days.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to ...

Millwall punch above their weight

Millwall’s season was overshadowed by the tragic death of owner John Berylson following a car accident. The American had been an exemplary owner, beloved by the fans for his leadership, passion and generosity. Millwall’s finances had been pretty good during his tenure, which we shall explore by looking at the most recent accounts from the 2022/23 season, when the club narrowly missed out on a place in the play-offs after finishing 8th. Millwall’s pre-tax loss slightly reduced from £12.6m to £12.2m, as revenue rose £0.8m (4%) from £18.6m to a club record £19.4m and player sales improved from a £0.1m loss to £2.5m profit. However, other operating income dropped from by £1.1m from £1.3m to £0.2m, while operating expenses increased £1.7m (5%) from £31.6m to £33.3m. The main driver of the revenue increase was broadcasting, which rose £1.1m (12%) from £9.1m to £10.2m, though match day was also up £0.4m (7%) from £5.8m to £6.2m. In contrast, commercial fell £0.7m (19%) from £3.7m to £3....