Skip to main content

New strategy makes its impact at Newcastle

Newcastle’s pre-tax loss widened from £14m to a club record £73m, despite revenue increasing by £40m (28%) from £140m to £180m and profit on player sales rising £4m to £6m. This was because operating expenses shot up by nearly two-thirds (£102m) from £156m to £258m.  The club said this was “driven mostly by investment in the playing squad, in alignment with a long-term strategic objective to improve the competitive position of the team.”

All three revenue streams improved, led by match day, where the return of fans to the stadium led to a steep increase from only £176k to £27.5m. Commercial also rose £8m (37%) to £28m, while broadcasting was up £5m (4%) to £124m.

Unsurprisingly, Newcastle’s £73m pre-tax loss is one of the highest in the Premier League, only surpassed in 2021/22 by Manchester United £150m, Chelsea £121m and Leicester City £92m.

Newcastle regularly posted profits under Ashley until the pandemic struck in 2020, the only exceptions being 2010 and 2017, when they were playing in the Championship.   In the nine years up to 2019, this added up to £120m profit, which is impressive from a financial perspective, though the Toon Army would have surely liked to have seen more of that money on the pitch.

One area where Newcastle have plenty of room for improvement is player trading, considering that they have made less than £8m profit from player sales in the last two years. It will be a similar story this season, as there have been no big money departures.

Following the increase, Newcastle’s £180m revenue is now 11th highest in the Premier League, just behind Everton £181m.  They are miles below the Big Six, less than half of the sixth highest club, Arsenal £369m. Furthermore, the top three clubs all earned at least £300m more than Newcastle, led by Manchester City £613m.

Currently, Newcastle’s £28m commercial income is firmly in the bottom half of the Premier League, even below clubs like Leicester City, Watford and Aston Villa. Even more depressing, the gap to the Big Six clubs is absolutely huge, e.g. Manchester City lead the way with £309m, while sixth placed Arsenal are more than £100m higher.

Newcastle’s 95% wages to turnover is the highest (worst) in the Premier League, ahead of Everton 90% in 2021/22. This important ratio is well above UEFA’s recommended upper limit of 70%, but this is somewhat inevitable with the new ownership’s investment strategy.

Newcastle’s squad cost, based on amounts paid per the club’s balance sheet (as opposed to market value), shot up from £233m to £354m. This has more than doubled in just three years and will have further increased after this season’s expenditure. Newcastle’s new owners provided £79m of capital in 2021/22 then a further £127m after the accounts, adding up to £206m. After paying £305m to purchase the club, that means that PIF have now spent over half a billion (£511m).

Until the club manages to significantly grow its revenue, it will have to use some fancy financial footwork to stay within FFP rules.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/