Skip to main content

Owners have pumped money into Forest

Nottingham Forest’s pre-tax loss tripled from £15.5m to £46.2m, despite revenue rising £11.3m (61%) from £18.4m to a club record £29.7m, as operating expenses increased by £25m (46%) from £54m to £79m.  In addition, profit from player sales fell £10.2m from £14.3m to just £4.1m.  Forest’s £46.2m pre-tax loss was one of the largest reported in Championship, only surpassed by the other promoted clubs Fulham £57.0m and Bournemouth £55.5m.

Forest are no strangers to losses, as they have only reported a profit once since 2005 – and that was entirely due to a £40m loan write-off in 2017. Otherwise, the club has consistently lost money, amounting to £141m in the last 10 seasons, including £108m in the five years since Marinakis arrived.

Forest’s staff costs increased with the wage bill up £21.4m (57%) from £37.2m to £58.6m. This was very largely the price of success, as it included £20.9m bonus payments for promotion.

Since the arrival of Marinakis, Forest’s revenue has grown by £8.9m (43%) from £20.8m to £29.7m, with increases in all three revenue streams: broadcasting £4.0m, commercial £3.1m and match day £2.2m.

Of course, Forest’s revenue will be significantly higher this season in the Premier League. This is dependent on final finishing position in the league, though revenue for clubs promoted in the last six seasons was on average £134m, which would represent a £104m increase for Forest.

Forest’s transfer spend since promotion has been considerable, as they have spent an estimated .  This was sixth highest gross spend in the Premier League, according to Transfermarkt, ahead of the likes of Manchester City, Liverpool and Tottenham. It was also more than the two other promoted clubs combined.

Forest’s £21m debt was one of the lowest in the Championship, a long way below the likes of Bournemouth £184m, Blackburn Rovers £163m and Middlesbrough £148m.   However, Forest’s debt would have been much higher without Marinakis converting £93m debt to equity in the last five years, which makes £159m capitalised by various owners since 2013.

In the last 10 years various owners have pumped £168m into Forest, boosted by £31m from (net) player sales. The vast majority of this money has been used to simply cover operating losses with only £11m spent on improving infrastructure.

Clearly, Forest’s primary objective this season is to avoid relegation, hence the massive transfer spending last summer. Of course, this does not guarantee that they will stay up, but it does at least give them a fighting chance.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...
Post a Comment
Read more