Skip to main content

Owners have pumped money into Forest

Nottingham Forest’s pre-tax loss tripled from £15.5m to £46.2m, despite revenue rising £11.3m (61%) from £18.4m to a club record £29.7m, as operating expenses increased by £25m (46%) from £54m to £79m.  In addition, profit from player sales fell £10.2m from £14.3m to just £4.1m.  Forest’s £46.2m pre-tax loss was one of the largest reported in Championship, only surpassed by the other promoted clubs Fulham £57.0m and Bournemouth £55.5m.

Forest are no strangers to losses, as they have only reported a profit once since 2005 – and that was entirely due to a £40m loan write-off in 2017. Otherwise, the club has consistently lost money, amounting to £141m in the last 10 seasons, including £108m in the five years since Marinakis arrived.

Forest’s staff costs increased with the wage bill up £21.4m (57%) from £37.2m to £58.6m. This was very largely the price of success, as it included £20.9m bonus payments for promotion.

Since the arrival of Marinakis, Forest’s revenue has grown by £8.9m (43%) from £20.8m to £29.7m, with increases in all three revenue streams: broadcasting £4.0m, commercial £3.1m and match day £2.2m.

Of course, Forest’s revenue will be significantly higher this season in the Premier League. This is dependent on final finishing position in the league, though revenue for clubs promoted in the last six seasons was on average £134m, which would represent a £104m increase for Forest.

Forest’s transfer spend since promotion has been considerable, as they have spent an estimated .  This was sixth highest gross spend in the Premier League, according to Transfermarkt, ahead of the likes of Manchester City, Liverpool and Tottenham. It was also more than the two other promoted clubs combined.

Forest’s £21m debt was one of the lowest in the Championship, a long way below the likes of Bournemouth £184m, Blackburn Rovers £163m and Middlesbrough £148m.   However, Forest’s debt would have been much higher without Marinakis converting £93m debt to equity in the last five years, which makes £159m capitalised by various owners since 2013.

In the last 10 years various owners have pumped £168m into Forest, boosted by £31m from (net) player sales. The vast majority of this money has been used to simply cover operating losses with only £11m spent on improving infrastructure.

Clearly, Forest’s primary objective this season is to avoid relegation, hence the massive transfer spending last summer. Of course, this does not guarantee that they will stay up, but it does at least give them a fighting chance.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s
1 comment
Read more

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is
Post a Comment
Read more

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl
Post a Comment
Read more