Skip to main content

Not much of a European consolation prize for Spurs

The ideal outcome for Spurs from here would be to qualify for the Europa League by coming sixth, but as it stands they look marginally more likely than Brighton and Villa to finish seventh and collect the European consolation (or, depending on your perspective, booby) prize.

The Europa Conference League is a curious competition, raising a number of issues from a Tottenham perspective, including glory versus pragmatism, Spurs’ current standing in European football, and what their ultimate aims are at the moment.

It’s fair to say Tottenham’s first foray into the Europa Conference League two years ago doesn’t conjure up especially happy memories. In fact, the main positive Spurs got from the competition was that early exit, which Antonio Conte later acknowledged helped them qualify for the Champions League at the end of the season. Without those spare midweeks, his view was that Tottenham’s small squad probably wouldn’t have had the legs to overhaul Arsenal and claim fourth place.

Are Spurs to turn their noses up at a trophy given it’s 15 years since they won one?  There is some validity in this perspective, but in reality, Spurs would be on a hiding to nothing. Don’t win it and they would get taunted for losing to Mickey-Mouse opposition in a nothing competition; win it and they’d face accusations it was only a tinpot trophy anyway which hasn’t really ended that much-mentioned drought.

Spurs could end up having to play 17 Conference League matches, starting with two play-off matches in August. That’s a huge amount of effort for a trophy without a huge amount of prestige and which carries the reward of only a place in the following season’s Europa League (something Spurs should achieve by finishing in the Premier League’s top six, or potentially top seven, next season anyway).

 Financially, the rewards are hardly great either given the volume of games — Roma pocketed around £17million in prize money for winning the competition last season, alongside some pretty paltry television money. By contrast, the average amount teams were paid for the Champions League group stages alone was £53.7million and that’s before taking into account far more lucrative TV rights and the vast sums for going deep in the knockout stages (by reaching the quarters Chelsea picked up £79.7million in prize money). 

Europa Conference League advocates sometimes argue that being in the competition means a chance to blood academy players. But in reality, what it more means is minutes for fringe players who supporters are largely tired of anyway. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Lau on the ropes

Financial challenges are building up for Guichan Lau whose company WBA Holdings owns 66 per cent of West Bromwich Albion.   His company's accounts show that it is in default on a £2 million from a West Midlands heating company called Warmfront Holdings. Warmfront has agreed to take no action to reclaim the loan and interest until February next year.  Given a punitive rate of interest of 5 per cent a month, the amount outstanding will then be around £4 million. Lai has missed three deadlines to repay a loan from the Baggies to his Hong Kong company Wisdom Smart Corporation.  [sic]  Meanwhile the club have a £20m loan from MSD UK holdings at an annual interest rate of 13.8 per cent.