Skip to main content

No early end in sight on United takeover saga

The Manchester United takeover saga rolls on, with the rumour mill once again causing sharp gyrations in the club’s New York-listed shares. By Friday, the stock had gained more than 25 per cent through the week on reports — later denied — that the Qatari bid was edging ahead of its British-led rival.

Further fuel to the speculation came when Rio Ferdinand, the former United defender, posted a YouTube video while waiting on a train platform in which he said the Qatari takeover was set to be concluded within days. With no football to distract, the atmosphere is febrile.

Despite the surge, United’s share price has yet to return to the highs of mid-February. With football’s summer transfer window kicking into gear, pressure for a resolution is mounting.

The fate of one of football’s most illustrious clubs rests in the hands of the Glazer family — the six siblings who control United through a share structure that grants them supercharged voting rights. Those who know them say they are slow to reach decisions, and may well be divided on how to proceed, in particular on whether they want to retain a minority stake.

Joel and Avram have been more involved in the process than the other four siblings who are directors.  Joel controls 19 per cent of the voting rights.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/