West Bromwich Albion’s managing director, Mark Miles, recently confirmed what every Baggies’ fan knew, namely that the club continued to face financial challenges. West Brom’s auditors had already rung an alarm bell when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player sale.
Another indication of Albion’s financial issues came when
they took out a £20m 4-year loan with MSD Holding UK Ltd in December 2022 “to
finance the general business operations of the club”, secured on the club’s
assets including the stadium. Moreover,
this loan is high interest, currently charging nearly 15% (9.75% plus SONIA
4.93%), which means that Albion have to stump up around £3m a year.
Given the supporters’ understandable scepticism about the
club’s management, they felt obliged to add, “for the avoidance of doubt, the
loan will only be spent on the purposes of the football club”, though they did
not define exactly what was meant by “purposes”.
The loan itself can be seen as an indictment of how the club
has been run, given that Albion had benefited from Premier League money for
many years, either directly or in the form of parachute payments.
Albion have effectively been in decline ever since the club
was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m
to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake.
There have been reports that Egyptian businessman Mohamed
Elkashashy and sports lawyer Chris Farnell have been in talks about making an
investment. However, this might not be a dream ticket, given that Farnell was
briefly disqualified from being a director of football after trying to takeover
Charlton Athletic, while doubts have been raised over whether Elkashashy has
the necessary funds.
Despite relegation to the Championship, West Brom’s pre-tax
profit actually increased from £0.1m to £5.4m, mainly thanks to profit from
player sales rising £13m from £4m to £17m. Revenue dropped £42m (39%) from
£107m to £65m, but this was largely offset by cutting costs £34m (31%) from
£111m to £77m.
Traditionally West Brom have been quite prudent financially,
making money every season in the eight years between 2010 and 2017. However,
they then posted losses three years in a row, including a hefty £23m in
2019/20, before returning to profitability.
Like many other clubs, West Brom have become increasingly
reliant on player sales with £80m profit in the last six years. During this
period, they have made more than £10m on four occasions, including £29m in
2019/20, mainly thanks to the sales of Salomon Rondon to Chinese club Dalian
and Jay Rodriguez to Burnley.
WBA revenue has more than halved since the Premier League
high of £138m in 2017, falling £73m, largely due to much smaller central TV
distributions, though there were also reductions in commercial and gate
receipts.
Despite the decrease, Albion’s £65m revenue was the third
highest in the Championship, only behind Fulham £72m and Sheffield United £67m.
The three clubs relegated from the Premier League the previous season therefore
had by far the highest revenue in the division.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of parachute payments, there
is no doubt that they make it difficult for other clubs to compete, so Albion
have effectively wasted this big advantage.
Even after a steep decrease, Albion’s £42m wage bill was
still fourth highest in the Championship. They were only below the three
promoted clubs (Fulham £90m, Bournemouth £61m and Nottingham Forest £59m),
whose wages were inflated by hefty promotion bonuses.
West Brom’s gross debt was really not that high for the
Championship, far below the likes of Bournemouth £184m, Blackburn Rovers £163m,
Middlesbrough £148m and Birmingham City £135m.
Only £17m owner funding* has been provided to West Brom in the last 10
years, because Lai and his colleagues are either unwilling or unable to provide
any money. In fact, in the last five years there was actually an outflow of
£5m. Many clubs’ owners have provided
substantially more funding than Albion, albeit with varying degrees of success,
as the Championship is a division that has an endless appetite for owner
support.
*Owner loans only, but in some clubs these are effectively donations and may be converted into equity.
Would like to understand how the author concluded that 'Only £17m owner funding has been provided to West Brom in the last 10 years'. To the contrary, I don't believe Albion have received any owner funding in the last 10 years and longer.
ReplyDeleteI will check this as I don't want to offer any comfort to the current regime at The Hawthorns or their predecessors. It underlines the need for an effective independent football regulator, but I don't think we will get one.
DeleteI an going to change the wording because owner loans are technically funding, but not from a supporter perspective.
ReplyDeleteBut the Owner has never loaned Albion any money. Albion have a loan from MSD and other companies affiliated with Lai have loans from Albion (at contrasting rates of interest) but the only money Lai has ever provided is to the previous Owner for his shares, the club has never seen a penny from him. Furthermore, aside from the monies owed to the club by companies affiliated with Lai, he himself inherited a £5m debt to the club which he has repeatedly failed to pay back, breaking various promises in the process. Appreciate the coverage but it's completely false to suggest Lai has put any money into the club.
DeleteFans will have more in depth knowledge. Just a shame to see a club with a great history undermined by the owner.
ReplyDelete