Skip to main content

This won't surprise Baggies fans, but it's still unacceptable

West Bromwich Albion’s managing director, Mark Miles, recently confirmed what every Baggies’ fan knew, namely that the club continued to face financial challenges.   West Brom’s auditors had already rung an alarm bell when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player sale.

Another indication of Albion’s financial issues came when they took out a £20m 4-year loan with MSD Holding UK Ltd in December 2022 “to finance the general business operations of the club”, secured on the club’s assets including the stadium.  Moreover, this loan is high interest, currently charging nearly 15% (9.75% plus SONIA 4.93%), which means that Albion have to stump up around £3m a year.

Given the supporters’ understandable scepticism about the club’s management, they felt obliged to add, “for the avoidance of doubt, the loan will only be spent on the purposes of the football club”, though they did not define exactly what was meant by “purposes”.

The loan itself can be seen as an indictment of how the club has been run, given that Albion had benefited from Premier League money for many years, either directly or in the form of parachute payments.

Albion have effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake.

There have been reports that Egyptian businessman Mohamed Elkashashy and sports lawyer Chris Farnell have been in talks about making an investment. However, this might not be a dream ticket, given that Farnell was briefly disqualified from being a director of football after trying to takeover Charlton Athletic, while doubts have been raised over whether Elkashashy has the necessary funds.

Despite relegation to the Championship, West Brom’s pre-tax profit actually increased from £0.1m to £5.4m, mainly thanks to profit from player sales rising £13m from £4m to £17m. Revenue dropped £42m (39%) from £107m to £65m, but this was largely offset by cutting costs £34m (31%) from £111m to £77m.

Traditionally West Brom have been quite prudent financially, making money every season in the eight years between 2010 and 2017. However, they then posted losses three years in a row, including a hefty £23m in 2019/20, before returning to profitability.

Like many other clubs, West Brom have become increasingly reliant on player sales with £80m profit in the last six years. During this period, they have made more than £10m on four occasions, including £29m in 2019/20, mainly thanks to the sales of Salomon Rondon to Chinese club Dalian and Jay Rodriguez to Burnley.

WBA revenue has more than halved since the Premier League high of £138m in 2017, falling £73m, largely due to much smaller central TV distributions, though there were also reductions in commercial and gate receipts.

Despite the decrease, Albion’s £65m revenue was the third highest in the Championship, only behind Fulham £72m and Sheffield United £67m. The three clubs relegated from the Premier League the previous season therefore had by far the highest revenue in the division.

Whatever the rights and wrongs of parachute payments, there is no doubt that they make it difficult for other clubs to compete, so Albion have effectively wasted this big advantage.

Even after a steep decrease, Albion’s £42m wage bill was still fourth highest in the Championship. They were only below the three promoted clubs (Fulham £90m, Bournemouth £61m and Nottingham Forest £59m), whose wages were inflated by hefty promotion bonuses.

West Brom’s gross debt was really not that high for the Championship, far below the likes of Bournemouth £184m, Blackburn Rovers £163m, Middlesbrough £148m and Birmingham City £135m.  Only £17m owner funding* has been provided to West Brom in the last 10 years, because Lai and his colleagues are either unwilling or unable to provide any money. In fact, in the last five years there was actually an outflow of £5m.  Many clubs’ owners have provided substantially more funding than Albion, albeit with varying degrees of success, as the Championship is a division that has an endless appetite for owner support.

*Owner loans only, but in some clubs these are effectively donations and may be converted into equity.

 

Comments

  1. Would like to understand how the author concluded that 'Only £17m owner funding has been provided to West Brom in the last 10 years'. To the contrary, I don't believe Albion have received any owner funding in the last 10 years and longer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will check this as I don't want to offer any comfort to the current regime at The Hawthorns or their predecessors. It underlines the need for an effective independent football regulator, but I don't think we will get one.

      Delete
  2. I an going to change the wording because owner loans are technically funding, but not from a supporter perspective.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But the Owner has never loaned Albion any money. Albion have a loan from MSD and other companies affiliated with Lai have loans from Albion (at contrasting rates of interest) but the only money Lai has ever provided is to the previous Owner for his shares, the club has never seen a penny from him. Furthermore, aside from the monies owed to the club by companies affiliated with Lai, he himself inherited a £5m debt to the club which he has repeatedly failed to pay back, breaking various promises in the process. Appreciate the coverage but it's completely false to suggest Lai has put any money into the club.

      Delete
  3. Fans will have more in depth knowledge. Just a shame to see a club with a great history undermined by the owner.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/