Skip to main content

The pluses and minuses of stadium rebuilds

Football stadiums remain unused for most of the year, so it makes sense for clubs to use them for other activities where possible, such as sporting events and music concerts, in order to boost match day income.

For example, Old Trafford is used for the annual Rugby Super League Grand Final, while Arsenal hosted Arctic Monkeys at the Emirates and Tottenham staged the World Heavyweight showdown between Anthony Joshua and Oleksandr Usyk.

In fact, Tottenham’s new stadium has been designed as a multi-use facility, leading to a 10-year deal with the NFL to stage American Football games, whereby Spurs apparently take all the catering and merchandising revenue.

Three key stadium expansions are:

  • Liverpool – third tier added to the Anfield Main Stand, adding 8,500 seats, increasing capacity to 53,000. Opened at start of 2016/17 season.
  • Manchester City – third tier added to the South Stand, adding 7,000 seats, increasing capacity to 55,000. Opened at start of 2015/16 season.
  • Tottenham Hotspur – the new stadium added 31,000 seats, increasing capacity from old White Hart Lane’s 32,000 to 63,000. Opened in April 2019 with the first full season in 2019/20.

The stadium expansion has boosted match day revenue at all three clubs. There were steep increases at Liverpool, up from £62m to £84m, and Manchester City, up from £43m to £57m, while Tottenham’s income has more than doubled from £45m to £95m.

Of course, the other side of the coin is that a club still has to pay for an expanded stadium in a number of ways, which we can see by looking at the impact on Tottenham’s accounts.

First of all, the cost of the new stadium was funded by financial debt, which has shot up to £853m, the highest in the Premier League.

In itself that is not a major issue, but Spurs do have to find the money for higher interest payments. Even though they were very smart in refinancing their debt at a very low 2.7% interest rate (with repayment terms extended to 2051), they still had to pay a chunky £22m in 2021/22.

Finally, there are additional costs in running a larger stadium, which have been reflected in Spurs’ other expenses rising to a new high of £120m.

Despite their financial challenges, Everton are progressing with work on their new 52,888 capacity stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock, even though it will cost as much as £760m according to Farhad Moshiri. Former chief executive Denise Barrett-Baxendale said, “It will boost and safeguard our ability to compete financially alongside this country’s football elite.”

Their city neighbours Liverpool are in the process of extending the Anfield Road Stand, adding 7,606 seats to take the capacity to 61,000, though the £80m development may be delayed after the main contractor, the Buckingham Group, filed a notice to appoint administrators.

Manchester City have recently received planning permission to expand the North Stand, adding 6,000 seats to increase the Etihad’s capacity to 61,000.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do