Skip to main content

Allegations made against Scunthorpe owner

With the cupboards bare, bills to pay and another relegation looming, Scunthorpe United fans were holding out for a hero. Then David Hilton arrived.  The Nottingham-born businessman bought the club from the deeply unpopular Peter Swann in late January, clearing a six-figure tax bill and pledging to take Scunthorpe back to the English Football League.

An investigation by The Athletic has found that a man we strongly believe to be Hilton was sentenced to two years in prison for 15 counts of fraud by false representation under the name of David Anderson.

In a case that started at Nottingham Crown Court in late 2014, Anderson was also disqualified from being a company director for five years after pleading guilty to 15 charges.

Hilton has made no secret of the fact he was born David White and changed his name to Hilton for unspecified “family reasons”. In fact, until very recently, Hilton still had a Facebook account under the name of David White.

It is unclear if Hilton complied with the terms of the current non-League owners’ and directors’ test (OADT), overseen by the English Football Association (FA). It must be completed by every owner or director and requires the disclosure of “previous or other names”. Hilton’s form is not publicly available and Hilton did not reply when The Athletic asked if he had disclosed any previous names on the form.

Asked about this and David Anderson’s conviction for fraud, an FA spokesperson said: “We are aware of these serious allegations and are looking into them.”

Under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, convictions of under two years and six months are considered spent after four years. For the vast majority of professions, you do not have to disclose a spent conviction when applying for a role and that has certainly been football’s attitude in the past.

Under pressure to beef up their rules before the independent regulator does it for them, the English Football League and Premier League have already revised their OATDs. From this summer, the tests now say that any individual with two or more fraud convictions, whether they are spent or not, must disclose them. The FA, which is responsible for the non-League OADT, is considering a similar requirement.

As the source of Hilton’s wealth remains unclear — there is certainly nothing filed at Companies House that suggests he has the ability to fund Scunthorpe — and there is no other readily available evidence of any other source of significant funds, it is only inevitable his ownership of this community asset will come under greater scrutiny.

Hilton is a man who says he “buys and sells land for a living” but, under different aliases, has created a long list of short-lived businesses. Eleven companies in which he — as either White or Hilton — has been named as a director have been dissolved since 2008, with none in existence for more than three years.

Hilton’s takeover of Scunthorpe, signed off in February, included neither Glanford Park nor the adjoining land that has always commanded the higher value. He paid only £3 for the club but agreed to settle a tax bill of just under £200,000 and pay January’s wage bill, although he also acquired the £60,000 that was sitting in the club bank account.

The real deal was for the club’s property assets. For those, Hilton agreed to pay Swann a figure in the region of £3million, with a completion deadline of May 24.  This is now the subject of a court action.

Ground share?

The Athletic has been told by sources close to the club, who wish to remain anonymous to protect their jobs, that Hilton has a deal in place with Gainsborough Trinity, a Northern Premier League club based 16 miles away from Scunthorpe, to rent their ground, The Northolme. The National League has sanctioned the move, should it be required, but with a capacity of just over 4,000 and only 500 seats, it can only be a short-term fix.

At the start of April, Hilton upset many fans by revealing his intention to close down the club’s academy and move training to Ilkeston, his old club, 70 miles away.

The final months of last season might have been disastrous but, after an ambitious recruitment drive, Scunthorpe are the odds-on favourites for promotion. They also remain a full-time professional outfit and have a proven leader at this level in the dugout in Jimmy Dean, who won manager of the month for August.

Attendances have also been remarkably resilient. Even last season, the average gate was 3,259.  Off-field disquiet, however, has continued. Hilton was absent when Scunthorpe’s relegation was confirmed by a 2-0 loss to Oldham Athletic last season and he has overseen a turbulent summer of redundancies and resignations.

Sitting at the back of the court with The Athletic last week was an observer who described himself as “a lifelong fan and shareholder”. He did not wish to share his name but said he was very pleased that we were there, too. “I don’t trust the new bloke or the old one,” he said. “And I probably trust the new bloke even less.”

This is brilliant investigative journalism by The Athletic and an electronic subscription to this publication is excellent value.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/