Skip to main content

The malaise at United

For years, as their empire went from strength to strength under Ferguson’s management, United were cited as the gold standard — the ultimate yardstick on the pitch and off it. To return to that line from Sean Dyche, yes, there was always glossiness about Manchester United, but there was an unmistakable earthiness too. It was a global brand with a local heart. Or, if you prefer, a local club with a global outlook.

But the Manchester United of 2023 seems less sure of itself, less comfortable in its own skin. It is no longer even comfortable in its historic Old Trafford home, which, like the team, has deteriorated under the Glazer family’s ownership.

For a decade since Ferguson’s retirement, though, United, as a club, has drifted.   He was a truly exceptional manager and a very hard act to follow.  When he had a great team he was always building the next one.   Players feared and respected him.

But one thing that is widely agreed upon is the sense of stagnation under the Glazers’ ownership: the team, the stadium, so many different strands of the club and the business.

Ten Hag has brought a certain kind of stability. But progress feels fragile now, just as it did in those positive moments under Louis van Gaal, Jose Mourinho and Solskjaer. At various points over the past decade, after a fleeting upturn in results, there has been talk of a successful “reset” within the club. It has never seemed wholly convincing. But a full reset doesn’t seem possible for as long as the Glazers retain control and a culture of mediocrity persists.

The Academy

Then there is the academy. Few clubs place as much importance on youth development as United, who, beyond the fame of the Busby Babes and the Class of ’92, have named a homegrown player in their matchday squad for every competitive match since 1937. Here, too, there has been an acceptance — belated, grudging — that United spent too long standing still, living on past glories, as Arsenal, Manchester City and Chelsea in particular set a new standard at academy level.

Old Trafford and Carrington (Aon Training Complex)

The decline of Old Trafford can be overstated at times — it is still among the best stadiums in the Premier League — but it does show signs of neglect compared to many of the new or redeveloped facilities elsewhere. A lack of legroom is a common complaint. So too do some of the dated concourses behind the shiny facade.

The club claim to have spent £100million on the stadium in the 2010s, including £20million in 2019 (most of it on improvements to accessibility, security upgrades and hospitality areas), but the last significant project was the construction of the corner quadrants in 2006, which was signed off before the Glazers took over.

Redevelopment options are complicated by the Manchester-Liverpool railway line that runs behind the South Stand. But these challenges are described as surmountable. The big hold-up is investment.

The same goes for United’s training ground at Carrington, which was widely described as state-of-the-art when United moved there in 2000 — a drastic upgrade on their previous training ground, The Cliff, and unlike anything any of their rivals had.   It is still one of the best around, but the club want to redevelop, renovate and extend it. Again, architects have been appointed (in this case KSS). Again, the project is on hold.

For the most part, we are talking about first-world problems. Crisis talk at Manchester United is always relative; over 10 seasons that have been beyond the worst fears of any supporter or staff member, they have finished outside the Premier League’s top six once. And that year, the first after Ferguson’s retirement, they finished seventh. That is also the only time they have missed out on European qualification.

That is the thing about the modern football landscape. The biggest, most powerful clubs are now so rich — and the financial divide within the game is now so great — that it is almost impossible to fail on a grand scale. It isn’t like 50 seasons ago, when United, six years after being champions of Europe, were relegated from the old First Division.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl