Skip to main content

Juventus face many challenges

Juventus have published their accounts for the 2022/23 season, which was disappointing for a number of reasons.  After the Italian Football Federation (FIGC) brought charges against Juventus for financial irregularities, the club’s board of directors resigned, including chairman Andrea Agnelli, vice-chairman Pavel Nedved and chief executive Maurizio Arrivabene.

The club has actually had to deal with two separate legal cases: the first one involved over-stated capital gains via inflated player trading values, while there was also another one with allegations of false accounting involving salary “manoeuvres”.

To add to Juve’s woes, their former star player, Cristiano Ronaldo, has recently taken legal action against the club over €19.5m unpaid wages (linked to the salary manoeuvres case).

And to prove that it never rains, but it pours, Paul Pogba has failed a drugs test, so his Juve career is in the balance, though from a purely financial perspective this could give the club the opportunity to terminate the misfiring French midfielder’s contract with a big salary saving.

Still a huge pre-tax loss

There are two ways of looking at Juventus’ 2022/23 financial results: on the one hand, there has been a substantial reduction in the deficit; on the other hand, the pre-tax loss was still huge at €117m and also one of the largest in Italy.

Juventus’ 2022/23 accounts cover a season when they finished 7th in Serie A (following the points deduction) and reached the semi-finals of the Coppa Italia. In Europe, they were eliminated at the group stage of the Champions League, dropping down to the Europa League, where they got to the semi-finals.

Their pre-tax loss more than halved from €237m to €117m (€124m after tax), as revenue rose €46m (11%) from €414m to €460m, partly due there being no more COVID impact, while profit on player sales increased €19m (67%) from €28m to €47m.

The club noted that the loss would have been further reduced by around €23m without the adverse impact on revenue and costs of the various legal issues, both Italian and international.

Their losses over the three seasons up to 2022 were also among the highest in Europe with their €544m only surpassed by Barcelona €840m and PSG €725m.  The last time that Juventus posted a profit was back in 2016/17, but in the six years since then they have lost a horrific €739m (after tax).

The importance of player trading

Juventus’ profit from player sales in 2022/23 rose €19m (67%)from €28m to €47m, which was a decent result, but less than half of the gains made the previous season by Fiorentina €113m (Vlahovic to Juventus) and Inter €105m (Lukaku to Chelsea and Hakimi to PSG).

The importance of player trading to the Juventus business model is clearly illustrated by the steep reduction in profits in the last three years, when they only averaged €35m, which was almost €100m less than the €132m in the preceding 4-year period.  That said, Juventus had still made the most money in Italy from player sales up to 2022 with €446m, which was nearly €200m more than Napoli €262m and Inter €256m, followed by Fiorentina €231m and Atalanta €226m.  The problem is that this excellent performance is very largely driven by deals from a few years ago. As we have seen, the trend is most certainly not Juve’s friend in this case.

Excluding player sales, Juventus revenue has dropped €34m (7%) in the past four years from the €494m peak in 2018/19 to €460m, though this is still the club’s second highest ever. The reduction has been driven by broadcasting and match day, due to worse performance in Europe, partly offset by commercial growth.

The importance of Europe

It is imperative that Juventus qualify for the Champions League to boost broadcasting income, as Serie A TV rights are so low at €1.1 bln, especially after the most recent deal fell 14% (domestic down 5%, international 40%).  As a comparison, the club that finished last in the Premier League in 2021/22 (Norwich City) received €114m TV money, which was nearly 50% more than the Italian champions.

Juventus earned €64m from UEFA competitions last season, which was the lowest of the four Italian Champions League representatives, as they were eliminated at the group stage. Inter’s achievement in reaching the final was worth €100m, while semi-finalists Milan received €85m and quarter-finalists Napoli got €77m.

Juventus’ wage bill reduced by €55m (16%) from €337m to €282m, as part of what the club described as “incisive structural cost rationalisation actions”. These included offloading a number of players, some of them on loan, while performance-related bonuses were obviously lower. It should further fall this season, as some big earners left the club.

Juventus have been very reliant on capital injections from their owners, announcing another €200m increase this season. This is the third time that the club has had to go to the shareholders for cash recently after €300m in 2019/20 and €400m in 2021/22, which means a total of €900m in just five years (less fees).

Juventus need to return to their former levels, as success on the pitch will drive revenue growth. As a minimum, they need to finish in one of the top four places this season, thus qualifying for the lucrative Champions League.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/