Skip to main content

Qataris will not increase United offer

The Qatari group bidding for Manchester United will not increase their existing offer of £5 billion despite the threat posed by a new deal being tabled by Sir Jim Ratcliffe.

This week it emerged that the Glazers were considering Ratcliffe’s offer of £1.5 billion for a 25 per cent stake as part of what could be a staged takeover at Old Trafford. One insider close to the process has described the British billionaire’s proposal as “feasible”.

However, sources close to the Qatari group being led by Sheikh Jassim Bin Hamad al-Thani say that the news of Ratcliffe’s restructured bid — he had initially offered to buy the 67 per cent stake belonging to the Glazer family — amounts to another pressure tactic designed to make them increase their bid.

While the Glazers value United at about £6 billion, the Qataris remain convinced the price is too high and are standing by their offer of £5 billion for a 100 per cent purchase: not least because Erik ten Hag’s side are misfiring on the pitch, the debt stands at about £1 billion and the Old Trafford stadium and training ground remain in dire need of modernisation.

The new proposal from Ratcliffe is being met with some scepticism among certain well-placed observers who question whether a significant sum of money will be available for investment in the football club. Further to that, it is unclear how much influence Ratcliffe will enjoy if his stake is limited to 25 per cent.

Even so, the deal could yet be one the Glazers accept if it is the first step in Ratcliffe and his petrochemicals firm, Ineos, taking full control.

When Ratcliffe was initially bidding for the entire Glazer stake, his offer met the overall valuation of the American owners and it was for that reason that he was considered the favourite to purchase the Premier League club. Even now his offer for a reduced stake meets the Glazer valuation.

The revised deal also removes the threat of potential litigation. Some holders of the publicly traded A shares were preparing to launch a legal challenge if Ratcliffe limited his deal to the B shares — which carry more voting rights — owned by the Glazers. As it is, the new deal would involve Ratcliffe buying a mixture of A and B shares

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do