Skip to main content

Upbeat mood at Dortmund

Borussia Dortmund posted an €11m pre-tax profit in 2022/24 (€10m after tax), which represented a €41m improvement on the previous season’s €30m loss.

Revenue rose €48m (13%) from €377m to €425m, a new club record, boosted by profit from player sales increasing €10m (15%) from €63m to €73m. This was partially offset by €15m (3%) growth in operating expenses, while net interest payable was up €2m to €6m.

There was good growth across all three of the main revenue streams, though commercial was the star of the show, rising €33m (18%) from €184m to €217m, a new high for the club. Match operations nearly doubled from €23m to €44m, as COVID restrictions were lifted, while broadcasting increased €12m (9%) to €158m.

After nine consecutive years of profits, which generated €227m between 2011 and 2019, Dortmund were hit hard by COVID, which led to three consecutive losses, adding up to €150m that “put our business model to the test”.

However, it was business as usual in 2022/23 as the club returned to profitability. Indeed, the board expects another net profit this season of between €15m and €25m.

Good profits from player sales

Dortmund’s profit from player sales rose €10m from €63m to €73m, mainly due to the sales of Erling Haaland and Manuel Akanji to Manchester City. The previous season had benefited from Jadon Sancho’s transfer to the other Manchester club, United.

Jude Bellingham’s big money move to Real Madrid for more than €100m was booked after these accounts closed, so will be reflected in the 2023/24 financials.

Dortmund cited this as a good example of the importance of such deals to the club’s business model, as the transfer policy “presents significant opportunities to generate substantial income”, though they also admitted that this might be “contrary to sporting interests”.  In fact, Dortmund’s transfers have generated nearly €1 billion sales proceeds in the last decade.

Bayern’s revenue was around 80% higher than Dortmund, which is a massive difference between the first and second ranked clubs in a country. This is far more than the gap in all other leading countries – with the exception of France, where PSG are in a class of their own financially.

Dortmund earned €73m from the Champions League after reaching the last 16, where they were eliminated by Chelsea. This was €9m more than the previous season, but was still a lot lower than Bayern’s €107m.  Dortmund have earned an impressive €347m from European competition in the last five years, so it is no surprise that the club described the potential income here as “extremely lucrative”.

Dortmund have the highest crowds in Germany, averaging over 81,000, which represents a near sell-out of the Signal Iduna Park. The closest challengers are Bayern Munich 75,000, followed by Schalke 04 61,133 and Hertha BSC 53,652.

Dortmund’s board appear to be in an upbeat mood, “We are confident that these figures herald a return to our former strength and that the most difficult economic period in more than 15 years is now well and truly behind us. From an economic standpoint, the key takeaway is that our business model is fully functional again now that the pandemic-related restrictions have been lifted.”

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/