Skip to main content

Champions League matters financially for Scottish clubs

Celtic have earned €36.1m from the Champions League, which is much more than Rangers’ €20.2m in the Europa League and Aberdeen’s €4.8m in the Europa Conference. This is despite the fact that Celtic finished bottom of their group, while Rangers came first in their group, thus proceeding to the last 16.

Celtic were Scotland’s sole representative in the Champions League group stage this season, earning €36.1m, which was made up of €15.6m participation fee, €4.0m prize money, €10.2m UEFA coefficient payment and €6.2m TV pool.  In other words, nearly half of their income is just for making it to the group stage, i.e. in the shape of the €15.6m participation fee.

Rangers’ overall UEFA ranking was a bit behind Celtic’s at 58th, but their UEFA coefficient payment in the Europa League was much smaller.  Rangers will have a better coefficient next season, as they will drop a season without any ranking points, possibly overtaking Celtic.

Rangers have earned €20.2m, including €5.0m from the Champions League, which is a sort of parachute payment for clubs eliminated in the play-off round, where they were beaten by PSV Eindhoven.  As a result, they dropped down to the Europa League, where they have so far received an additional €15.2m. This comprises €3.6m participation fee, €4.7m prize money, €2.9m UEFA coefficient payment and €3.9m TV pool.

Aberdeen finished third in their Europa Conference group behind PAOK and Eintracht Frankfurt,  This comprises €2.9m participation fee, €1.0m prize money, €0.4m UEFA coefficient payment and €0.5m TV pool.

If Rangers did manage to be victorious in the Europa League, their €33.4m earnings would still be lower than Celtic’s €36.1m, which highlights the disparity with the far more lucrative Champions League.

The Champions League remains a big differentiator for Scottish clubs from a financial perspective, even if they don’t manage to get out of the group. The only way that a Europa League representative can hope to match that is by actually winning the tournament.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/