Skip to main content

Player sales help Aberdeen's solid finances

Aberdeen’s better results in 2022/23 on the pitch also helped with their finances, as they swung from a £2.2m net loss to a £1.1m profit. Profit from player sales shot up from £1.0m to £7.5m, which more than offset a £6.3m operating loss.

Revenue rose £1.9m (14%) from £13.9m to £15.8m, but operating expenses were up by even more, increasing by £2.8m (15%) from £19.2m to £22.0m.

Two of Aberdeen’s revenue streams grew: gate receipts were up by more than a third (£1.1m) from £3.0m to £4.1m, while commercial also rose £1.1m (15%) from £7.3m to £8.4m. On the other hand, broadcasting dropped £0.3m (8%) from £3.6m to £3.3m.

Not all clubs have published accounts for 2022/23, but Aberdeen’s £1.1m profit is currently the second best financial result in Scotland for last season, albeit miles below Celtic’s record-breaking £33m profit.

In general, Scottish clubs tend to run a tight ship, so almost all of them were in a narrow range between £2m profit and £2m loss, i.e. effectively break-even. Rangers were a bit of an outlier with their £4.1m loss.

Aberdeen would have made a large loss without the £7.5m gain from player sales, which is easily the club’s best ever performance. To place this into perspective, this was more than the last 15 years put together.

Aberdeen’s £1.1m pre-tax profit is the first time that the club has made money in eight years. In fact, they have only been profitable twice in the last decade, though most of their losses in this period were relatively small, so the aggregate deficit was only £8.4m.

Aberdeen chairman Dave Cormack further explained the club’s strategy: “To compete at the highest levels in Scottish football, and to qualify for Europe each season, we continue to invest more in player wages and transfer fees. This has led to annual operating losses which, over time, have to be balanced by positive player trading and increased commercial and football performance-related income.”

As a result of only finishing 10th in the league in 2021/22, Aberdeen did not qualify for Europe, which was the first time that it did not achieve this ambition since 2014, which the club said caused a “significant loss of income”.

However, Europe has not actually been a huge money spinner for Aberdeen, as they have earned less than a million Euros in TV money in each of the last few seasons. This was because they did not get past the third qualifying round in the Europa League or the play-off round in the Europa Conference League

Aberdeen’s average attendance rose nearly 20% from 13,103 to 15,636. The club said that fan engagement initiatives, like the Red Shed, Dons Day Out and the trialing of Fan Zones, had contributed to these strong numbers.

However, this was only the fifth highest in Scotland, obviously miles below Celtic 58,714 and Rangers 49,116, but also lower than Hearts 18,513 and Hibernian 17,453.

New stadium

Aberdeen have been looking for a new stadium since 2009, due to the difficulties in further developing Pittodrie. An initial project near Loirston Loch in the south of the city was approved by the council, but hit problems due to questions around land ownership and the council’s rejection of an application to build a community sports centre.

As a consequence, the club submitted new plans in 2016 to develop a new stadium and training facilities near Westhill. Although this project overcame legal challenges from local residents, progress stalled due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Most recently in 2021, Aberdeen proposed another new stadium design at the city's beachfront close to Pittodrie. The club said that the council has now started to have more detailed discussions about these plans.

Wages

Aberdeen’s wage bill rose £1.7m (17%) from £10.2m to a new club record £11.9m, due to continued investment in the first team squad and higher bonuses for finishing third and guaranteeing UEFA group stage football.

As a result, wages have grown by more than 50% in the last six years. Cormack said that this growth “ensures we remain competitive with other clubs, such as Hibs and Hearts, who are also making significant investments.”

Even after last season’s increase, Aberdeen’s £11.9m wage bill is still a fair way below Hearts’ £15.4m, so remains fourth highest in Scotland. It is around £50m less than Rangers £64m and Celtic £61m. Put another way, the wages at the Big Two are nearly six times as much as the Dons.

In the past, Aberdeen have pointed out the difficulties of maintaining a competitive squad, particularly with rising wages in the English market, which was perhaps best evidenced when Adam Rooney moved to 5th tier Salford City in 2018 for a higher salary.

In fact, Aberdeen’s £11.9m wage bill is lower than all but two English Championship clubs, namely Blackpool and Peterborough United (both since relegated).

Aberdeen’s owners have provided £21.1m of funding in the last decade, though almost all of this (£19.9m) has been in the last five years with only £1.2m in the preceding 5-year period. However, £14.9m of this was in 2017 and 2018, essentially to finance the new training facility, with relatively little since then.

This is a pretty solid set of financials from Aberdeen, demonstrating that their new focus on player trading can deliver. That said, it does rely on making a couple of lucrative player sales each year to offset largish operating losses.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/