Skip to main content

What Ineos deal means for United

Some commentators have seen Manchester United's second half fightback to beat Aston Villa as a sign of a new spirit at the club after off the pitch changes.

Ratcliffe’s company, INEOS, has bought 25 per cent of Manchester United in exchange for sporting control. The deal, which has cost around £1.3billion ($1.6bn), means the club’s football operation will now be overseen by INEOS but the Glazer family, who have owned United since 2005, remain in overall charge. The Glazer family and Class A shareholders will receive the same price of $33 per share.

The $300million cash injection will be used to improve Old Trafford and other infrastructure, and INEOS will have the casting vote on any decision related to football — eg, transfer policy or the future of Ten Hag.

When the United-INEOS deal was announced, it revealed that Ratcliffe had acquired 25 per cent each of the Class A and Class B shares. By offering Class A shareholders just as much opportunity to participate in the offer as the Glazers, INEOS hopes to minimise the risk of legal action from its fellow minority stakeholders.

One criticism of INEOS at Nice (the club they own in France’s Ligue 1) is that Ratcliffe and his staff put too much faith in the figures that were there before them, believing the same structures only needed greater investment to improve results. They are unlikely to repeat the same mistake at Old Trafford.

Sources close to the INEOS bid, speaking on condition of anonymity when relaying private conversations, have told The Athletic that Ratcliffe sees the improvement of infrastructure at Old Trafford and the club’s Carrington training ground as essential. His proposal also included a statement of intent to invest in the women’s team at United.

The Ratcliffe bid has made no formal statement about debt but, behind the scenes, it has provided assurances that no “fresh debt” (ie, any money borrowed to acquire United) will be landed onto the club’s balance sheet and will instead be borne by INEOS.

Ratcliffe, though, does not see the need to “keep tipping more money into the bucket” when it comes to United.

 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do
Post a Comment
Read more

Fulham cost the owner £1.4m a week

Things have changed a lot at Craven Cottage since Tommy Cooper was chairman.  Fulham are arguably London’s poshest club.  As their chief executive has said, Fulham supporters turn left on the plane.   I remember going there some years ago and was placed next to home supporters who were wearing suits.   The club also experimented for a while with having a section for ‘neutral’ fans. The following analysis draws on the latest report from the Swiss Ramble.   The accounts are now a year old, but as the forensic analyst observes from his Zurich lair, the business model remains much the same. i.e, the amount the owner has to shell put would consume all my non-property assets in five days. Under Silva, Fulham have established themselves as a solid Premier League club, losing their tag as a “yo-yo” club. Before the arrival of the Portuguese coach, on the previous two occasions that they were promoted to the top flight they had failed to avoid an immediate ...
2 comments
Read more