Skip to main content

Could Chelsea's strategy deliver in the medium term?

A last minute Liverpool goal saw Chelsea go down 1-0 in the League Cup final to boost Jurgen Klopp’s farewell tour.  Cheap shots have been aimed at the club overnight such as ‘billion dollar bottlers’.   But could they have a strategy that will deliver in the medium term?

Chelsea’s modelling based on underlying performance factors suggests they should be fifth in the Premier League, rather than tenth, a thesis backed up by similar projections at rival clubs and viewed internally as being good progress, given Chelsea finished 12th last season and have the top flight’s second-youngest squad.   Of course, in the meantime, it is the table that matters.

Perceptions of the Americans have been negative since their £4.25 billion takeover of Chelsea in May 2022. First impressions are at the root. Boehly installed himself as interim sporting director and oversaw two hyperactive transfer windows, where a net £470 million was lavished on players as diverse as the veteran striker Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, and Brazil Under-20 captain Andrey Santos.

Some moves appeared to involve little recruitment diligence. Marc Cucurella was bought hastily for £60 million after someone in Brighton & Hove Albion’s football department called a friend in Chelsea’s to say Manchester City were bidding (only £30 million, it turned out) for the Spaniard. Boehly handed his personal phone number to people and invited them to his opulent villa in Mykonos, from where he was Zoom-calling agents.

Over confident owners?

An agent close to deals during that period described it being “like [Farhad] Moshiri’s Everton on speed”. A US lawyer involved in previous American takeovers of English teams told the Sunday Times “every new American owner of a Premier League club has made missteps at first and that usually the problem is outsourcing key decisions through lack of confidence about an alien sport. Whereas Boehly and Eghbali’s issue was the opposite. “They came in like Masters of the Universe, thinking they knew better right off the bat.”

It was never Boehly’s intention to be a sporting director and both he and Eghbali are significantly less hands-on now than in their first season at Chelsea. They have deepened their footballing knowledge and become genuine fans. A Chelsea director jokingly asked Boehly recently if his plan was to finance the club through all his trips to the club shop to buy kit and memorabilia, while Eghbali often brings his entire family to games, watching from a box at Stamford Bridge with his parents, wife, son and daughter.

Thirty players have arrived since the takeover but those with close knowledge of what Boehly/Eghbali inherited say a high volume of transfer activity was necessary because a squad laden with older players needed churn and sanctions on Roman Abramovich compromised the previous regime’s forward planning.

The need for sustainability

The spending spree was also needed to establish a more sustainable model. Throughout his 18 years of ownership, Abramovich spent an average £1 million a week propping up Chelsea, accruing debts of £1.5billion. Under non-sovereign wealth ownership, this could clearly not be sustained and while big fees have been lavished in assembling the new squad of young players, wage costs are down dramatically.

There is now a joined-up approach to playing personnel decisions. For years, Chelsea used the loan system to park unneeded senior players with money-making in mind, collecting loan fees and protecting transfer value. Lucas Piazón went out on seven loans and Baba Rahman spent eight years at Chelsea but didn’t play for them in the last seven.   They want to instead fill Chelsea’s allocation of seven loan-out spots with youngsters — with development prioritised.

Chelsea’s next phase includes significantly building up its data department. In November, they visited LA Dodgers and saw how the franchise has a hub of about 35 number-crunchers working not only in recruitment but areas such as performance analytics, player support, technology and researching developments in the game.

There are plenty of people waiting for them to fail, but they may have the last laugh, although doing something about the stadium is perhaps the biggest challenge.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/