Skip to main content

Ratcliffe's vision for United

Sir Jim Ratcliffe says he wants Manchester United to fight for Premier League titles within three years, as he laid out his vision to rebuild one of the world’s most popular football teams. Speaking to journalists at Ineos’s headquarters in west London on Wednesday, the British chemicals billionaire called for “patience” from fans and warned that transforming the club would take time.

However, he acknowledged that supporters had already endured more than a decade of “complete misery”. “It’s not a light switch, it’s not one of these things that changes overnight,” said Ratcliffe, who completed a deal to buy 27 per cent of the club on Tuesday. “The fans would run out of patience if it was a 10-year plan, but it’s certainly a three-year plan to get there.”

The 71-year-old has set his sights on winning the Premier League and the Champions League, and knocking local rivals Liverpool and Manchester City “off their perch”. To achieve those goals, the top priority in the short term was improving recruitment both on and off the pitch, he said. United has been one of football’s biggest spenders over the past decade, but results have not matched the outlay on players.

“There’s not much I can do about what’s happened in the past,” he said. “So our thinking is all about how we become first-in-class in recruitment going forward, which means you need the right people.”

Ratcliffe, who controls Ineos, is set to invest a further $100mn in United by the end of the year, which would take his total investment above $1.6bn. His deal valued the club at $6.3bn including debt, a record in football. The six Glazer siblings still own a majority stake in the club.  “I don’t think I’ll ever lose money,” Ratcliffe said when asked about the valuation. “I don’t believe it’s going to devalue. I don’t believe I’ve been financially stupid.”

United’s record valuation belies a club that has fallen behind in the race for trophies. The 20-time English champions have failed to win the Premier League since 2013, when Sir Alex Ferguson retired as manager.

Ratcliffe, who has taken control of the club’s football operations as part of the deal with the Glazers, also highlighted the need to upgrade the club’s creaking infrastructure.   He said it would cost roughly £1bn to refurbish Old Trafford but cautioned that it was not the “perfect” solution because of the challenge of modifying an antiquated stadium.

Old Trafford, United’s home since 1910, has been overtaken by modern venues such as Tottenham Hotspur’s new ground in north London. Ratcliffe, who is a Monaco resident, said there was a wider conversation to be had with the community and public sector about a “more ambitious project on the site” that could help “regenerate” the area in a manner similar to how the 2012 Olympics boosted east London.

United has failed to make a profit since before the Covid-19 pandemic, which battered its balance sheet and hastened the need to raise funds. The Glazers said they would be open to selling the club in part or in full in November 2022, but a lengthy strategic review, complicated by concerns for minority shareholders, meant it dragged on for well over a year.

 Ratcliffe brushed off questions about whether he had the desire to increase his stake or even take majority control. “I haven’t had the energy to think about the future or worry about it because I’m focused on the problem today, not what I might do in three, five, 10 years.”

United’s New York-listed shares closed at $15.99 on Wednesday, down 8.6 per cent, well below a high of $26 this time last year.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/