Skip to main content

Will Ratcliffe honeymoon last?

Newly-minted United shareholder Sir Jim Ratcliffe finally broke cover this week to outline his vision for the club after buying a minority stake. In an hour-long meeting with journalists, including Scoreboard, in London he talked through the bidding process that resulted in his $1.65bn investment, his immediate priorities, and his long-term aspirations.

First on the agenda, fix the club’s shoddy recruitment strategy. United have spent big under the Glazers, but expensive signings have often disappointed.

To do that, Ratcliffe wants to bring in top executives, and upgrade the club’s often-criticised culture. New chief executive Omar Berrada was the first in what will be a series of big hires. “We need to populate all the key roles with people who are best in class, 10 out of 10s”, said the chemicals billionaire.

The message was that United’s off-field success as a commercial entity needs to be matched by challenging for trophies. “This is going to be a very sports-led club. It’s all going to be about performance on the pitch.”

But while the bar is high, there is also expectation management. This supertanker is not going to turn around overnight. He wants the club to be back on top within three years. “If we give people false expectations, then they will get disappointed. So I think the key thing is our trajectory, so that people can see that we’re making progress.”

With revenue last year of €742.8mn last year, according to Deloitte, United are still high on football’s rich list. That gives the club a clear advantage over rivals at a time when spending rules begin to bite. Ratcliffe noted that Financial Fair Play regulations had limited the financial muscle of state-backed clubs — such as Manchester City and Paris Saint-Germain — by a “considerable margin”.

Where he does favour a helping hand from the government is in rebuilding Old Trafford. He put a £1bn price tag just on upgrading the current stadium, but floated the idea of a far bigger regeneration project akin to the one that revived large parts of east London for the 2012 Olympics.

I just don’t see money coming from a government of any colour when there is a desperate shortage of public money and many claims on it – NHS, defence, local government etc.   This could be portrayed as a vanity project even if it did add real community and city value.

Ratcliffe’s record in football is patchy. Ineos bought OGC Nice in France’s Ligue 1 in 2018, but it has taken until the current season to see any pick-up in performances on the pitch. Ratcliffe acknowledged that it had been a steep learning curve, and that Ineos, which has investments in cycling, sailing, and motorsport, had made “a lot of cock ups” and “some really stupid decisions”.

“We have made mistakes in football so I’m really pleased that we made those mistakes before we arrived here in Manchester United. If we hadn’t, this would be a much tougher job for us. Because it is huge and it’s very exposed.”

United fans have good reason to feel excited, relieved and optimistic about the future. But fixing a big club is hard work. Just look at Chelsea, Olympique Lyonnais, and Barcelona. And Ratcliffe will be trying to repair United’s fortunes while still just a minority shareholder. Honeymoons often get curtailed in football.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/