AC Milan probe could threaten club's recovery

AC Milan’s record-breaking sale by Elliott Management in 2022 was proof the football club had completed a remarkable turnaround under the US hedge fund’s stewardship. The Italian team was sold to private equity group RedBird Capital Partners for €1.2bn, the highest price paid for a club outside the English Premier League. It was once again winning Serie A titles and competing in the lucrative European Champions League.

Last year, it made its first profits in more than two decades. But police raids earlier this month have dragged AC Milan back into a messy battle of wills pitting Elliott, the notoriously combative $65bn fund manager, against Blue Skye, a investment firm run by two longtime former partners of the hedge fund and which owned a small stake in the club before the sale.

The two Italian financiers behind Blue Skye have claimed the hedge fund violated their minority shareholder rights by signing the RedBird deal, and have raised questions over whether Elliott still controls the club. Elliott is a creditor to AC Milan but has rejected suggestions of operational involvement. It sees the fight as a brazen attempt by a disgruntled shareholder to get a bigger payout from the sale.

Blue Skye has pursued the asset manager through courts in Italy and Luxembourg, although some of its claims have been dismissed. For Elliott, which waged and won a 15-year campaign against the Argentine state over unpaid debts, the row is not just about money — the sums in dispute are in the tens of millions of euros, according to people familiar with the matter. At stake is also the reputation of the US hedge fund founded by Paul Singer, whose son Gordon has spearheaded the AC Milan investment.

The dispute took a dramatic turn on March 12 when Italian police searched the AC Milan’s offices. During the raids, which also took place at the home of the club’s chief executive Giorgio Furlani, Italy’s financial police looked for documents to substantiate claims that somehow RedBird did not truly buy the club. “The suspicion is that Elliott currently maintains effective control of the company”, the search warrant said.

The probe, expected to last at least a year, risks frustrating RedBird’s efforts to consolidate AC Milan’s recovery. It comes as the New York firm founded by former Goldman Sachs banker Gerry Cardinale faces pushback over plans to move the club to a new stadium south of Milan. Local authorities hope to convince AC Milan to redevelop the ageing San Siro Stadium it shares with rival Inter Milan.

The Milan probe also threatens to spiral out of Italy: the search warrant includes claims that Elliott “appears to have a dominating influence” over French club Lille. Prosecutors say this would be in breach of rules set by Europe’s football oversight body Uefa. Elliott is also a lender to Merlyn Partners, which controls the French team. AC Milan and Lille competed in the Champions League in the 2021/22 season.

Uefa bars one entity from exerting “control or influence” at two clubs competing in the same European tournament. A breach would prevent the lower-ranked club from joining the competition. But Uefa does not address the case of creditors and has been lenient on creative shareholder arrangements. Owning more than one club is increasingly common in European football and has faced little regulatory pushback. According to a Uefa report, 28 Italian clubs are part of a broader ownership structure.

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month. He was approaching ninety, but still went to games. Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules. Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen. There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere: https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog