Skip to main content

Forest may have to sell star player to avoid further penalty

Nottingham Forest face having to sell one of their star players before the end of June or risk another points deduction next season for breaching financial rules, even if they are relegated.

The judgment of the independent commission which imposed a four-point deduction on Forest for breaching permitted losses in the three years up to June 30, 2023, reveals they are at risk of being in breach again this season.

It would mean Forest having to make about £30 million in profit from selling players. They do have names that would command large fees such as Morgan Gibbs-White, the 24-year-old attacking midfielder.

Forest’s own calculations, disclosed in the findings, show they made a loss of £40 million in the 2021-22 financial year (FY22) when they won promotion from the Championship via the play-offs, £52 million in FY 23 and, according to the judgment, are “projecting to realise losses of approximately £12-17 million for the year ending June 30, 2024”.

That total loss over three years would be between £104-109 million — £21-£26 million above the maximum allowable loss of £82 million (a smaller figure than the £105 million maximum losses permitted to Premier League clubs because it includes one year when Forest were in the Championship).

The independent commission’s findings state: “What happens for its second season in the Premier League is potentially a matter between the parties next year, when the PSR for FY24 is considered.”

Forest did tell the independent commission it would not breach limits for this season, but it is unclear whether that was based on an intention to sell a player.

Forest are considering whether to lodge an appeal against the four-point deduction, after saying they were “extremely disappointed” by the sanction after they admitted a breach of financial losses.

Although it is seen as unlikely, an appeal board could even increase the sanction as it has the power to “vary any penalty imposed or order made at first instance”, Premier League rules state.

It means Forest will have to weigh up if there is a risk in appealing. The club’s breach was £34.5 million above the permitted losses, 77 per cent higher than Everton’s £19.5 million, yet the Merseyside club had a ten-point deduction reduced to six on appeal, still harsher than Forest’s four-point punishment.

The more general question is whether the Premier League will become less attractive as a competition if legal judgments weigh heavily on the table.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/