Amid plenty of concerns about Chelsea’s somewhat unusual recruitment under Behdad Eghbali and Todd Boehly’s ownership, it was fair to give them credit for two things. First, there was an obvious plan. Second, it appeared cohesive.
Chelsea were signing younger players than any other club.
They were signing them to longer contracts than any other club. And in Mauricio
Pochettino, they appointed a manager whose managerial record suggested he was
more effective at working with emerging youngsters, at Tottenham Hotspur,
than he was working with established superstars, at Paris Saint Germain. It was
joined-up thinking.
This was, then, unashamedly a long-term project — not
necessarily the type of approach you associate with foreign owners who
immediately sink huge sums into a club they’ve just bought. That means, in the
short term, things can be difficult, for two reasons.
First, most obviously, you have to wait for youngsters to
reach their peak age. Second, it’s about cohesion and teamwork. Familiarity
between players is as important as their individual ability, and in
deliberately ripping up the remains of a side who were European champions just
two years beforehand, Chelsea were eschewing that collective experience.
In terms of expected goal difference, usually a good measure
of a side’s performance, Chelsea are fourth for the entire campaign. Results
themselves were worse than that, of course, and Chelsea finished sixth. That
was down to wasteful finishing and the fact that Chelsea made the highest
number of defensive mistakes that led to opposition shots in the division.
Pochettino can’t be entirely separated from that, but it’s also a natural
consequence of buying inexperienced defenders.
Pparting company with Pochettino — supposedly a mutual
decision, although you suspect if Chelsea had desperately wanted him to stay
on, they could have found an agreement — isn’t simply a harsh reflection of the
manager’s performance. It also throws into doubt Chelsea’s entire direction.
Eghbali and Boehly seemed committed to long-termism, but have reacted
unreasonably after a single season that doesn’t even constitute a failure.
It’s difficult to see that Pochettino’s successor will be
any better qualified for the job than Pochettino himself. There’s been a huge
demand for elite-level coaches this summer — Barcelona, Bayern Munich,
Liverpool, Juventus and perhaps Milan and Manchester
United are all on the prowl. Barca and Bayern, tellingly, subsequently
attempted to persuade the incumbent to stay on, such was the paucity of
options.
Comments
Post a Comment