Skip to main content

Derby find a saviour

After numerous false dawns, Clowes stepped up to save Derby from the threat of liquidation, just as it looked as if all hope had been lost, even though this reluctant hero would have much preferred to have remained in the background (and in his seat in Pride Park).

Derby had entered administration in September 2021 after former owner, Mel Morris, was unsuccessful in his attempts to sell the club. Morris had bought a 20% stake in May 2014, before purchasing the remaining shareholding from North American Derby Partners in September 2015 to take full control.

Given the club’s history, it’s incredible that things got so bad at Derby. Older supporters will remember a glorious period in the early 70s, when the legendary Brian Clough and Peter Taylor led the Rams to their first ever (old) First Division title in 1972, then guided the team to the semi-finals of the European Cup, where they were controversially eliminated by Juventus.

There was a steady decline after the loss in the 2019 play-off final to Aston Villa, as Derby narrowly avoided the drop to League One in 2020/21, before relegation the following year. In contrast, Villa will be playing in the Champions League this season, so this was a real “Sliding Doors” moment.

Derby went through no fewer than nine different managers between June 2015 and May 2021, as the club’s attempts to reach the Promised Land of the Premier League became increasingly desperate. Morris certainly paid a heavy price for this failure, admitting that the club had lost him “in excess of £200m”.

In addition, according to the administrators’ report, Derby owed £36m to HMRC, £24m to US investment group MSD Holdings and £15m to other creditors, including an outstanding £5m transfer instalment to Arsenal for Krystian Bielik.

Clowes had got involved after various other investors fell by the wayside, but Derby certainly had a narrow escape when the deal with Chris Kirchner, somehow the administrators’ preferred bidder, collapsed in June 2022, given that the American businessman has since been sentenced to 20 years in prison for fraud.

Clowes paid £33m to purchase the club, including the assets and certain liabilities, as prescribed by EFL regulations, of five companies in administration: SEVCO 5112 Limited, The Derby County Football Club Limited, Derby County FC Academy Limited, Club DCFC Limited and Stadia DCFC Limited.

In addition, the new owner spent £22m to secure the club’s stadium via his acquisition of Gellaw 202 Limited.  As part of the purchase, Clowes settled around £20m of liabilities. In addition, certain liabilities were transferred to the new company, Derby County (The Rams) Limited.

In 2022/23 Derby generated £20.4m revenue, boosted by £1.6m profit from player sales, but they had £32.6m operating expenses and £19.7m exceptional charges, leading to a £30.4m loss.  Derby’s reported £30.4m loss was actually the highest in League One in 2022/23, followed by that season’s champions, Ipswich Town £18.2m.

Derby’s £20.4m revenue was the second highest in League One, only below Ipswich Town’s £21.8m, but ahead of Bolton Wanderers £19.4m and Sheffield Wednesday £19.3m, then a big gap to fifth placed Plymouth Argyle £14.7m.  Derby’s revenue will obviously increase this season following promotion to the Championship, mainly thanks to the higher TV distribution, but also from likely increases in gate receipts and sponsorships.

Strong attendances

Derby’s average attendance bounced back from the 22,214 low in the Championship in 2021/22 to 27,259 in League One in 2022/23, as there was renewed enthusiasm about the club following the exit from administration.  Derby have had the highest average attendance in each of their two seasons in League One. In 2022/23, their 27,259 was ahead of Ipswich Town 26,181 and Sheffield Wednesday 25,378.  Even more impressive is the fact that Derby had the sixth highest crowds in the EFL and the 20th highest in all of England, while playing in the third tier.

Derby’s £17.2m wage bill was the third highest ever in League One, albeit a lot less than Sunderland’s £26.7m in 2018/19.   So it’s fair to say that part of Derby’s recent success has been driven by spending (relatively) big, but it should also be acknowledged that they have spent well. Many other clubs have splashed the cash, but have little to show for it.

Clowes put £36m into Derby in 2022/23 with the annual report noting that such support is critical to the club remaining a going concern, so the owner is likely to have to put his hand in his pocket again.

Derby County are a good example of the advantages and disadvantages of the owner funding model. This can work just fine while the owner is happy to provide financial support, helping to fund investment in the squad, but if he gets fed up with subsidising losses, then the club can face problems and even end up in administration.

The good news for Derby is that they found a saviour in the shape of lifelong supporter David Clowes, who has stabilised the club’s financial position, laying the foundations that allowed them to secure promotion.

As evidenced by the amazing crowds in League One, it is clear that this is a big club, but some patience will be required after all the trials and tribulations of the last few years.  The nature of football fans is to always want more, but in the meantime it should be enough that this storied club managed to avoid extinction

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...