Skip to main content

Wigan survive and revive

Wigan’s trials and tribulations started when the Hong Kong-based International Entertainment Corporation (IEC), a company that runs hotel and casino business in the Philippines, acquired the club in November 2018 for £22m (a price of £15.9m plus taking on £6.5m loans), ending 23 years of ownership by the Whelan family.

In June 2020, ICE sold Wigan Athletic to the mysterious Hong Kong based Next Leader Fund (NLF) for £17.5m, giving ICE a £1.6m profit, plus the repayment of the £24.6m they had invested. However, the club was immediately put into administration, as a result of the new owners not putting any funds into the club.

The club was kept going during administration by the sale of some of its young players, thus losing some of its prized “assets”, while the Supporters Club launched a fighting fund, raising more than £800,000, with former players joining fans in helping keep Wigan Athletic afloat.

Wigan Athletic had been in the Premier League as recently as the 2021/13 season, enjoying eight years in England’s top flight.

Following relegation from the Premier League, Wigan only survived two seasons in the Championship before dropping down to League One in 2014/15, before embarking on a yo-yo existence between England’s second and third tiers over the next eight years.

They just about avoided relegation to League Two in the season when they exited administration, finishing one point above the relegation places, though Leam Richardson managed to guide Wigan to the League One title the following season in 2021/22.

However, this was at least in part due to the Bahrain-based ownership investing heavily in the squad, but this was ultimately the root cause of the club’s subsequent financial challenges.

In 2022/23 Wigan’s pre-tax loss increased from £7.7m to a club record £13.4m, despite revenue almost doubling from £8.3m to £15.9m following promotion from League One to the Championship, as operating expenses rose £14.9m (79%) from £18.8m to £33.7m and profit from player sales reduced from £2.8m to £0.4m.

Understandably, the club described this financial result as “disappointing”, though the loss would actually have been even higher at £17.5m without the £4.1m write-off of a shareholder loan  Even though £13.4m was a significant loss for Wigan, the reality is that very few clubs make money in the Championship, so it was only average for this very competitive division.

Wigan have not posted a profit since the 2016/17 season, though they have usually managed to restrict the size of the losses. That said, they lost a total of £21.1m in the two full seasons under Al Jasmi, which is quite a lot for a club of Wigan’s size.   Another sizeable loss is likely to be reported for the 2023/24 season.

Following promotion, Wigan’s average attendance increased from 10,343 to 12,210 in 2022/23, though this was still more than 7,000 lower than the 19,375 peak in the Premier League. Even after the increase, Wigan’s 12,210 attendance was one of the lowest in the Championship, less than half of Sunderland 38,480, Sheffield United 28,746, Norwich City 26,131 and Middlesbrough 26,012.  Even after the increase,   As might be expected, Wigan’s crowds fell after relegation to League One in 2023/24, though their 10,442 was actually the eighth highest in the division

One of the main drivers of Wigan’s financial problems was the club spending too much money on wages.   However, the issue at Wigan is not so much the absolute size of the wage bill, but how much this is in relation to the club’s relatively low revenue, leading to some horrifically high wages to turnover ratios.   In League One Wigan are responsible for two of the three highest ever wages to turnover ratios, including a barely credible 214% in 2020/21 and 176% in 2017/18.

Wigan have never really been major actors in the transfer market, averaging just £5.4m in the six years following relegation from the Premier League.

In the three years since the return from administration up to 2022/23, Wigan’s owners provided £26.6m between them. Most of this came from Danson with his £18.1m in 2022/23 plus another £8.5m from Al Jasmi in the previous two years.

The auditors noted a “material uncertainty” around the club’s ability to continue as a going concern if it no longer received support from the owner, Mark Danson.

This is clearly not ideal, given Wigan’s recent troubled history, but it is worth noting that eight other clubs in the Championship included a similar “material uncertainty” comment, so fans should not be too alarmed.

The club’s revised strategy is “to utilise the resources at its disposal at any point in time to achieve the highest possible league position and success in cup competitions for the first team, whilst at the same time employing prudent financial management to ensure a stable future.”

Given that Wigan Athletic have nearly gone out of business twice in the last few years, that seems fair enough.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl