Skip to main content

City lose the battle,, but have they lost the war?

 Manchester City tasted defeat in the civil war that has engulfed the Premier League after clubs approved changes to sponsorship rules.

To rub salt in City’s wounds, their former chief operating officer Omar Berrada, who is now the Manchester United chief executive, made the first critical interjection backing the Premier League over Associated Party Transactions (APTs).

Chelsea, who had previously supported City over APTs, were also among the 16 clubs to vote in favour of the Premier League proposal. Only Aston Villa, Newcastle United and Nottingham Forest joined City in voting against.

City had argued that no vote should take place, claiming the APT rules were void and unlawful after a tribunal decision on their legal challenge. Rival clubs are now waiting to see whether City carry out their threat to launch further legal action and cause more ructions in the league.

To promote competitive balance in the league, the APT rules put a limit on how much money companies associated with clubs can feed to them via sponsorship deals.

It is understood City’s position remains unchanged on the matter and they now await further clarification from the tribunal that heard their case against the Premier League and deemed certain aspects of the APT rules “unlawful”. That is due to be released in January.

Despite the amendments being voted through by a 16-4 majority, the defeated clubs are of the view that others were sympathetic to their position but ultimately sided with the Premier League amid concerns about their potential exposure around shareholder loans.

I also continue to think that Premier League rules are open to challenge under competition law.   The civil war could damage the standing of the competition and means more legal bills for all those involved.   Arguably the lawyers are the real winners.

Meanwhile, Pep Guardiola has said he will stay at City even if they are relegated.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more