Skip to main content

City lose the battle,, but have they lost the war?

 Manchester City tasted defeat in the civil war that has engulfed the Premier League after clubs approved changes to sponsorship rules.

To rub salt in City’s wounds, their former chief operating officer Omar Berrada, who is now the Manchester United chief executive, made the first critical interjection backing the Premier League over Associated Party Transactions (APTs).

Chelsea, who had previously supported City over APTs, were also among the 16 clubs to vote in favour of the Premier League proposal. Only Aston Villa, Newcastle United and Nottingham Forest joined City in voting against.

City had argued that no vote should take place, claiming the APT rules were void and unlawful after a tribunal decision on their legal challenge. Rival clubs are now waiting to see whether City carry out their threat to launch further legal action and cause more ructions in the league.

To promote competitive balance in the league, the APT rules put a limit on how much money companies associated with clubs can feed to them via sponsorship deals.

It is understood City’s position remains unchanged on the matter and they now await further clarification from the tribunal that heard their case against the Premier League and deemed certain aspects of the APT rules “unlawful”. That is due to be released in January.

Despite the amendments being voted through by a 16-4 majority, the defeated clubs are of the view that others were sympathetic to their position but ultimately sided with the Premier League amid concerns about their potential exposure around shareholder loans.

I also continue to think that Premier League rules are open to challenge under competition law.   The civil war could damage the standing of the competition and means more legal bills for all those involved.   Arguably the lawyers are the real winners.

Meanwhile, Pep Guardiola has said he will stay at City even if they are relegated.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl