Manchester City tasted defeat in the civil war that has engulfed the Premier League after clubs approved changes to sponsorship rules.
To rub salt in City’s wounds, their former chief operating
officer Omar Berrada, who is now the Manchester United chief executive, made
the first critical interjection backing the Premier League over Associated
Party Transactions (APTs).
Chelsea, who had previously supported City over APTs, were
also among the 16 clubs to vote in favour of the Premier League proposal. Only
Aston Villa, Newcastle United and Nottingham Forest joined City in voting
against.
City had argued that no vote should take place, claiming the
APT rules were void and unlawful after a tribunal decision on their legal
challenge. Rival clubs are now waiting to see whether City carry out their
threat to launch further legal action and cause more ructions in the league.
To promote competitive balance in the league, the APT rules
put a limit on how much money companies associated with clubs can feed to them
via sponsorship deals.
It is understood City’s position remains unchanged on the
matter and they now await further clarification from the tribunal that heard
their case against the Premier League and deemed certain aspects of the APT
rules “unlawful”. That is due to be released in January.
Despite the amendments being voted through by a 16-4
majority, the defeated clubs are of the view that others were sympathetic to
their position but ultimately sided with the Premier League amid concerns about
their potential exposure around shareholder loans.
I also continue to think that Premier League rules are open to challenge under competition law. The civil war could damage the standing of the competition and means more legal bills for all those involved. Arguably the lawyers are the real winners.
Meanwhile, Pep Guardiola has said he will stay at City even if they are relegated.
Comments
Post a Comment