Skip to main content

Newcastle face stadium choices

Newcastle fans are celebrating their win over Spurs yesterday who were more of a threat than they have been in some recent games.

It is getting close to 100 years since Newcastle United were champions of England, in 1927, and 2025 could be the year the club decide to leave St James’ Park. They still have the not inconsiderable wealth of Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, the headlock of the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Rules to break free from and a resurgent team with the Champions League in their sights once more. These are complicated times.

January could be a third successive transfer window with no significant signing, but that could allow them in the summer to once again flex the financial might that had supporters celebrating outside St James’ Park in October 2021 when the takeover was completed.

However it all plays out, the next six months are pivotal for the club. If there is to be a first big push to land the Premier League crown since the emotional anguish of the failed attempt in 1996, then certain bricks are being put in place and they should not be removed.

Developing St James’ Park to increase its 52,300-seat capacity or moving to a new stadium is one of the biggest decisions in recent memory.

An announcement led by the club’s chief operating officer, Brad Miller, is expected in the spring. The scale of a fight to develop land in Leazes Park should the club decide it is too restricted to expand St James’ Park should not be underestimated. It would be the kind of political battle that Newcastle under Saudi ownership have so far steered clear of, and, based on the backlash provoked when such a move was tried in 1995, could take years.

Newcastle fought against local conservation groups and Friends of the Earth for nearly two years. Even after they finally received the green light, the potential of more challenges, legal disputes and an astronomical project bill meant they scrapped plans for a stadium that would have had a capacity of 55,000, with the possibility of being expanded to 70,000. Instead they redeveloped St James’.

Expanding the Gallowgate End and possibly the East Stand would cost in the region of £1billion. A new ground would be three times as expensive. Both projects would take years.

It was interesting, then, to see West Ham United, a club who moved stadium in 2016, announce an increase in turnover to £280million in their most recent accounts, less than Newcastle expect to post for 2024.

Howe insists that PIF’s plan on day one of the takeover — when the expressed desire was to win the Premier League and the Champions League within five to ten years — still remains in place, despite the introduction of Associated Party Transaction rules shortly afterwards.

 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...
Post a Comment
Read more