Skip to main content

Parachute payments make life difficult for Bristol City

Bristol City’s 2023/24 accounts cover a season when they finished 11th in the Championship, an improvement of three places over 2022/23 and the club’s best performance for five seasons.

However, the board acknowledged that this campaign was still below its aspirations, “Once again, the club found itself hovering around mid-table for the majority of the campaign and whilst there was little threat of relegation, there was not much excitement generated for a promotion push either.”

This season will be City’s 10th in a row in the Championship. During this time, they have not finished higher than 8th, so have missed out on the play-offs every season. On the other hand, they have now improved their league position three years in a row.

Bristol City have steadily managed to reduce their losses from the record high of £38.4m in 2020/21, but they have still lost a hefty £149m before tax in the last decade, when they only managed to generate a profit once with £11m in 2018/19.

Bristol City’s pre-tax loss was slashed from £22.2m to £3.3m, mainly thanks to profit from player sales more than doubling from £9.5m to £21.7m, though revenue also rose £5.8m (16%) from £36.6m to a club record £42.4m.   Bristol City’s £3.3m pre-tax loss is one of the best results achieved in the Championship in the last two seasons.

The main driver of the higher revenue was commercial, which rose £3.5m (17% ) from £21.4m to £24.9m, but there was also decent growth in match day, up £1.4m (23%) from £6.3m to £7.7m, and broadcasting, up £0.8m (9%) from £8.9m to £9.7m.

Commercial revenue

They have managed to grow revenue by £12.1m (40%) in the last five years, which is pretty good going. It is worth noting the importance of commercial income, which now accounts for 59% of total revenue, compared to 23% from broadcasting and 18% from match day.  City’s £24.9m commercial revenue is actually the highest in the Championship, a fair way ahead of Norwich City £17.1m, Stoke City £16.9m, Sunderland £14.7m and Middlesbrough £11.7m.  To underline the importance of commercial revenue to their business model, Bristol City earned 59% of their total revenue from these activities, which is easily the most in the Championship. The next highest are a long way back, i.e. Stoke City 54% and Swansea City 43%.

The growth was partly driven by more money for events staged at the stadium, including gigs by Kings of Leon and Take That.   Partly due to development at the Ashton Gate stadium, commercial income has shot up by nearly 60% in the last two years. It is likely to further increase with the new sports and convention centre.

Bristol City’s revenue is one of the highest in the Championship – if you exclude the clubs that benefit from parachute payments, who are at least £20m more in the first season after relegation, e.g. Norwich City earned £73m in 2023/24. That said, City do enjoy a decent revenue advantage over most clubs in the division, so arguably should be performing a bit better than mid-table.

The club noted that the reduction in the loss was “predominately due to the sale of Alex Scott to Bournemouth for a significant sum of money”, which led to profit from player sales more than doubling from £9.5m to £21.7m.

This was one of the best results in the Championship, where clubs usually make very little from player trading. Traditionally, the only ones that do well here are those that have recently been relegated from the Premier League, which highlights another benefit such clubs enjoy on top of parachute payments.

With the exception of Leeds United, no club without parachute payments has generated more revenue in the Championship than Bristol City’s £42m last season. In fact, City have four of the top 20 all time revenues if parachutes are excluded.

City’s average attendance increased by 10% from 20,573 to 22,554, which is the club’s highest since City were a top flight team in 1978/79. Little wonder that the club described the level of support received from the fans as “fantastic”.  Despite the growth, City’s 22,554 attendance was only mid-table in the Championship in 2023/24, a fair way below then likes of Sunderland 41,028, Leeds United 35,989 and Leicester City 31,238.

Ashton Gate is a multi-use stadium, which is shared with the Bristol Bears rugby union team with a capacity of 26,462. It hosted 38 matches in total in 2023/24. As a sign of its possibilities, it will be one of the eight host venues for the 2025 Women's Rugby World Cup.

City’s £34.9m wages were a lot lower than the amounts paid by those clubs benefiting from parachute payments, e.g. Burnley £54m in 2022/23 and Norwich City £52m last season.   That said, as it stands, City’s wage bill is actually the 6th highest in the Championship, the most paid by any non-parachute club, so they have an advantage against most other teams in the division.

City’s £15.7m squad cost was the 9th highest in the Championship, though a lot lower than the recently relegated clubs, e.g. Burnley and Watford had £134m and £103m respectively in 2022/23.

Debt and the owner

City’s gross financial debt fell slightly from £96m to £95m, with £92m of this owed to owner Steve Lansdown (via Pula Sports Ltd).  City’s gross debt of £96m is one of the highest in the Championship.  However, City’s debt is not really an issue, so long as Steve Lansdown remains a friendly owner, which he has amply demonstrated by converting £74m of debt to equity in the last five years, including £13m in 2023/24.  (The writer has been a satisfied client of Hargreaves Lansdown since the late 1980s).

For many years Bristol City have been dependent on funding from their owners, as noted by CFO Tom Rawcliffe, “The financial support provided by the Lansdown family continues to be significant, as evidenced by their commitment throughout the 2023/24 season, as well as their investment during the 2024 summer transfer window.”

He added, “We remain extremely thankful for their ownership”, which is fair comment, given that Lansdown has put in around £268m to date, which is a huge amount in anyone’s book.  To highlight the level of Lansdown’s commitment, in the five years up to 2022/23, City benefited from £121m of money from the owner, which was the second highest in the Championship.

Lansdown has indicated that the owners would be open to a sale (or partial sale) of the club, though this would only be to the “right partner”.  That said, his father first mentioned the possibility of a sale back in 2021, “We are actively looking for other investors to come into the football club to expand our brand and grow the club.”

Part of the club’s strategy has been to invest in the academy, where it said “the talent pathway continues to be a source of pride.”

It’s obviously really difficult to compete with clubs benefiting from parachute payments that have a much larger budget, but Bristol City are best placed financially of the non-parachute clubs, so they really should mount a decent challenge for the play-offs.  Maybe this is the season when they get it right on the pitch?

The football regulator bill is getting a mauling in the Lords from friends of the Premier League, but there is the potential for parachute payments to be ended or, more likely, reduced.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to ...

Millwall punch above their weight

Millwall’s season was overshadowed by the tragic death of owner John Berylson following a car accident. The American had been an exemplary owner, beloved by the fans for his leadership, passion and generosity. Millwall’s finances had been pretty good during his tenure, which we shall explore by looking at the most recent accounts from the 2022/23 season, when the club narrowly missed out on a place in the play-offs after finishing 8th. Millwall’s pre-tax loss slightly reduced from £12.6m to £12.2m, as revenue rose £0.8m (4%) from £18.6m to a club record £19.4m and player sales improved from a £0.1m loss to £2.5m profit. However, other operating income dropped from by £1.1m from £1.3m to £0.2m, while operating expenses increased £1.7m (5%) from £31.6m to £33.3m. The main driver of the revenue increase was broadcasting, which rose £1.1m (12%) from £9.1m to £10.2m, though match day was also up £0.4m (7%) from £5.8m to £6.2m. In contrast, commercial fell £0.7m (19%) from £3.7m to £3....