Skip to main content

Well run Napoli punch above their weight

The recent sale of Khvicha Kvaratskhelia to Paris Saint-Germain for €70m once again highlighted Napoli’s ability to make big money from transfers. In the case of the exciting Georgian winger, this was exacerbated by the fact that his value in the books was only €2m, so the profit from the deal weighed in at a hefty €68m.

In fact, based on the reported fee, this was the fifth highest profit from a player sale ever made by an Italian club. This is nothing new for Napoli, who have no fewer than four of the top ten player trading profits, including the best of all with €86m from the sale of Gonzalo Higuain to Juventus in the 2016/17 season.

Given Napoli’s financial disadvantages compared to the traditional “big” Italian clubs, their consistently high finishes in Serie A have been pretty impressive, but the wheels came off last season, when they fell to 10th place, which was their lowest league position since 2008/09.

Napoli’s pre-tax profit in 2023/4 fell from €118m to €91m, though this was still a hugely impressive figure by anyone’s standards. The club said that the decrease was due to “sporting results that were largely lower than expected”, which led to revenue dropping by €23m (8%) from their record €280m to €257m. In addition, profit from player sales was down from €80m to €71m.

Napoli’s €91m pre-tax profit was in a class of its own in last season’s Serie A, more than twice as much as the next highest, namely Lazio’s €41m.  This was in stark contrast to the large losses posted elsewhere, especially by Juventus €196m, Roma €76m and Monza €67m, though a few Italian clubs have started to make decent money, e.g. Atalanta €21m and Milan €12m.

In the last two seasons Napoli have generated an incredible €209m of profits, which has helped them to generate €174m in the last ten years (pre-tax).   The contrast between Napoli’s approach and that of other leading Italian clubs is evident, as seen by the financial results over the last five years. In this time the Partenopei made a €46m profit, while the others all lost huge sums, ranging from €318m at Milan to €857m at Juventus.

To illustrate Napoli’s success off the pitch, they have now delivered the three highest profits ever reported in Italy: €118m in 2022/23, €101m in 2016/17 and €91m last season. In fact, they have generated no fewer than six of the top 20 profits in Serie A.

Nevertheless, it’s clear that player trading is very important to Napoli’s business model, as the periodical sale of some of their stars has boosted their finances.  As a result of astute recruitment and an ability to extract a good price for their deals, Napoli have made the highest profit from player sales in Italy in the last five years, with their €298m being just ahead of Juventus €294m and Atalanta €290m.

Even after last season’s fall, Napoli’s revenue has still grown by €40m (19%) from their pre-pandemic peak of €217m to €257m, very largely driven by a €39m increase in commercial.  However, the failure to qualify for Europe will have a material impact on this season’s revenue, as they earned €77m here in 2023/24, including gate receipts, which was equivalent to 30% of total income.

Napoli had the fourth highest revenue in Italy in 2023/24, but the gap to the top three remained well over €100m. Indeed, both Juventus €409m and Inter €407m were €150m higher.

The importance of Europe

It is imperative that Napoli qualify for Europe (ideally the Champions League) in order to boost broadcasting income, as Serie A TV rights are so low at €1.1bln. That is only above Ligue 1 in the “Big Five” leagues, but more importantly it is around half of La Liga and nearly €3 bln less than the Premier League’s mega deal.

Napoli earned €69m for reaching the Champions League last 16, which was actually the highest of the Italian representatives, ahead of both Inter €66m and Lazio €61m, even though they got to the same stage.

Napoli’s 2023/24 Champions League income comprised participation fee €15.6m, prize money €19.7m, UEFA coefficient €22.7m and (estimated) TV pool €11.4m.  One reason they earned more than Inter and Lazio was a larger slice of the TV pool, thanks to finishing higher in Serie A the previous season.

However, last season’s income was lower than the €78m they received in 2022/23, when they went one stage further in the Champions League, reaching the quarter-finals before being eliminated by Milan.

Europe TV money has been extremely important for Napoli, earning them an impressive €242m in the last five years. This is the third highest of Italian clubs, albeit a lot lower than Inter €340m and Juventus €310m.

Napoli’s €27m match day revenue is a fair way below the top four clubs, who all earned at least twice as much: Inter €75m, Milan €69m, Juventus €58m and Roma €55m. They were also slightly lower than Lazio’s €28m.  It was a similar story for attendances with Napoli’s average of 46,967 being the fourth highest in Serie A, but a lot less than the top three clubs: Inter 72,838, Milan 72,008 and Roma 62,970.

Little investment has been made into the stadium infrastructure with the Stadio Diego Armando Maradona (renamed from the San Paolo in December 2020 to honour the club legend) looking a bit worse for wear these days.  The club would like to buy the stadium, so they can renovate it, but the local council is only willing to grant a long-term lease. This makes it difficult to grow this revenue stream.

Napoli’s wages increased by €5m (5%) from €111m to €116m, which was a little surprising, as the club’s sporting results were not as good as the previous season, so performance-related bonuses were lower. In “the season of the managers”, their compensation was up from €7.2m to €8.8m.  Italian clubs have been getting to grips with their wage bills, but Napoli are one of only two clubs that has actually cut wages since before the pandemic, the other one being Juventus.

To really emphasise the extent of Napoli’s achievement when they won the league in 2022/23, their €111m wages were easily the lowest of any of the Serie A champions in recent years. The wage bill for the other winners range from €328m for Juventus in 2018/19 to €170m for Milan in 2021/22.

Napoli have spent a lot of money on bringing players to the Maradona. In fact, according to Transfermarkt, Napoli had the second highest gross transfer spend in Serie A in the last 5 years (up to the 2024 summer window) with €458m, only surpassed by Juventus €686m.

Napoli have not had to rely on owner funding, unlike many other leading Italian clubs, e.g. in the last six years Juventus received around €900m capital from their owners, while Roma and Milan also benefited in this way with €647m and €600m respectively.

Napoli are clearly a very well run club, having generated massive profits in each of the last two years, which has resulted in relatively low debt and a very high cash balance.

However, this financial success has been built on a couple of pillars, namely large profits from player sales and money from the Champions League. The second of these will be absent this season, as Napoli failed to qualify for Europe, which means that the club is forecasting an operating loss.

It is equally true that Napoli’s ability to combine good financial results with sporting success came to a grinding halt last season, when they plummeted down the league. As president De Laurentiis once noted, “If you don’t win, supporters don’t care if you are good in the balance sheet. For them, it’s better you go bankrupt. But you must win.”

So far, this season has been a lot better forNapoli, who are back at the top of the table with a fighting chance of winning the league. If they do get over the line (for the second time in three seasons), it would be very impressive, given the much smaller budget compared to their main Italian rivals.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to ...

Millwall punch above their weight

Millwall’s season was overshadowed by the tragic death of owner John Berylson following a car accident. The American had been an exemplary owner, beloved by the fans for his leadership, passion and generosity. Millwall’s finances had been pretty good during his tenure, which we shall explore by looking at the most recent accounts from the 2022/23 season, when the club narrowly missed out on a place in the play-offs after finishing 8th. Millwall’s pre-tax loss slightly reduced from £12.6m to £12.2m, as revenue rose £0.8m (4%) from £18.6m to a club record £19.4m and player sales improved from a £0.1m loss to £2.5m profit. However, other operating income dropped from by £1.1m from £1.3m to £0.2m, while operating expenses increased £1.7m (5%) from £31.6m to £33.3m. The main driver of the revenue increase was broadcasting, which rose £1.1m (12%) from £9.1m to £10.2m, though match day was also up £0.4m (7%) from £5.8m to £6.2m. In contrast, commercial fell £0.7m (19%) from £3.7m to £3....