Skip to main content

Response to Brentford boss on football regulator

 Greg Campbell has hit back at a recent article in the Financial Times by Brentford’s Cliff Crown on the subject of the proposed football regulator.  Campbell is a partner in Campbell Tickell, a management consultancy.   He has written a code of governance for football clubs.

‘I was interested to read the opinion piece from Cliff Crown, chair of Brentford Football Club (“Regulation must not stop football clubs that dare to dream”, Pink ‘Un, February 4). However I believe there is more to the story.

While Brentford’s recent track record is impressive, parachute payments (to clubs relegated from the Premiership to the Championship) create a yo-yo effect instead of promoting competition. Clubs like Southampton, Leicester, Burnley, Sheffield United, Norwich, Ipswich, West Brom and not many others continually bounce up and down between the Premiership and the Championship. The parachute payments system distorts competition and makes it very hard for others to break through.

Plus the financing and funding model of English men’s football is broken: the Premier League’s broadcasting deal brings in £3.19bn a year. How is that money distributed? The football campaign group Fair Game calculates that for every £1,000 from the deal, around £880 goes to Premier League clubs; just over £70 to Championship clubs in receipt of parachute payments and around £33 to Championship clubs not in receipt of parachute payments.

The report concludes: “This falls to £6.22 for League One clubs, and £4.15 for League Two clubs. National League clubs get 58p while it drops to just 15p for National League North and South clubs.” Nearly every club in the Championship now spends more money on players’ wages than it receives in revenue.

And the vast majority of clubs rely on an owner-benefactor just to survive: 58 per cent of clubs in the top 92 (ie the Premier League, the Championship, and Leagues One and Two) are now technically insolvent. What we see in football — but especially the men’s game — is the effective result of self-regulation, ie no proper regulation at all.

So I see Crown’s article as essentially being about supporting the Premier League’s last-ditch efforts to get the football governance bill watered down, in the Premiership’s own interests rather than those of the sport, of fans and local communities
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...
Post a Comment
Read more

Levy's anomalous status at Spurs

It is now nearly a year since Daniel Levy was dismissed as Tottenham Hotspur chairman by the Lewis family.  It has been 12 months of dramatic twists and turns, with Spurs avoiding relegation on the final day of the Premier League season, and then spending unprecedented sums this summer to try to make sure such a scare never happens again. But while most fans focus on the football — and a dubbing by Brentford   — another set of issues have been bubbling away separately. These relate to Levy’s continued position as a minority shareholder in the club. This has been in the news for much of this summer, even as we approach the first anniversary of Levy’s dismissal, and specifically this month, after he missed the opportunity last week to participate in the Lewis family’s latest equity injection into the club. On Thursday morning the club confirmed that his shareholding has been diluted, down by roughly two per cent, after the creation of new ENIC shares. Levy’s dism...
Post a Comment
Read more