Skip to main content

What goes up inevitably comes down?

It looks very likely that the three teams promoted from the Championship last season will be relegated from the Premier League.

What is clear is that the number of points required to finish above the dotted line has been trending downwards for a decade, as have the cumulative points haul of the three relegated sides. It now requires mismanagement on a pretty epic scale for an established Premier League club to be relegated.

Seventeenth-placed Wolves are averaging less than a point per game but could feasibly fail to win another point and stay up with 26 points, which is what 18th-place Luton finished on last season. When Charlton were in the top flight the survival target was 40 points.

Usually, however, they are putting up a better fight than this. The nine-point gap between 18th-placed Ipswich and Wolves in 17th is also the biggest gap at this stage in the Premier League era, and by some distance: only once has the deficit been more than three points.

Yet even huge investment, spent smartly, guarantees nothing. According to Transfermarkt, Ipswich’s £106million spree following promotion was world football’s 13th-highest outlay during the summer transfer window.

Southampton, who spent just under £100million, were only two places further behind on that list and in a table of Premier League spending, they ranked seventh and eighth respectively. Leicester’s £72million outlay was a little more conservative, but was still more than Crystal Palace, Wolves, Newcastle United, Everton, Liverpool and Manchester City. But these days, even for a club like Leicester — who won the Championship with 97 points in their first season outside the top flight for a decade — there is no room for errors of judgment.

All three will be cushioned by parachute payments of £49million next season, a figure almost ten times bigger than their Championship rivals receive in Premier League solidarity payments. And that’s the other side to this story: the increasingly distortive effect of the Premier League’s economic model on the competitive balance of the division below.

Sheffield United and Burnley, both relegated last season, are second and third in the Championship, while Leeds United, relegated the season before (after staying up for two seasons), sit top of the table. Yet abolishing parachute payments, as the EFL’s chairman Rick Parry continues to lobby for, would threaten to disincentivise promoted teams from investing.

Indeed, there is a growing sentiment in Premier League boardrooms that granting the EFL’s wish would not be such a bad thing, as it would further entrench their top-flight status.

With American owners increasingly in place in the top flight, it is possible that there will be pressure to reduce the number of promotion places.   Investors don’t like to see their expensive franchises relegated, an unfamiliar concept in the US.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do

Fulham cost the owner £1.4m a week

Things have changed a lot at Craven Cottage since Tommy Cooper was chairman.  Fulham are arguably London’s poshest club.  As their chief executive has said, Fulham supporters turn left on the plane.   I remember going there some years ago and was placed next to home supporters who were wearing suits.   The club also experimented for a while with having a section for ‘neutral’ fans. The following analysis draws on the latest report from the Swiss Ramble.   The accounts are now a year old, but as the forensic analyst observes from his Zurich lair, the business model remains much the same. i.e, the amount the owner has to shell put would consume all my non-property assets in five days. Under Silva, Fulham have established themselves as a solid Premier League club, losing their tag as a “yo-yo” club. Before the arrival of the Portuguese coach, on the previous two occasions that they were promoted to the top flight they had failed to avoid an immediate ...