Bournemouth case emphaizes complexity of Premier League rules

Bournemouth managed to avoid breaching the Premier League’s profitability and sustainability rules (PSR) after having a £71.4million shareholder loan write-off approved by the league. The tone of the following article might imply that I have some grudge against Bournemouth: far from it, I find them an interesting side to watch on television. But I do get puzzled by the complexity and application of Premier League rules and whether they create as level a playing field as is practicable.

The south-coast club lost £77.2m pre-tax in the 2022-24 PSR cycle, which included the £71.4m loan write-off. This means that if the Premier League had blocked the write-off from counting towards PSR, Bournemouth would have breached the financial regulations, with pre-tax losses at £148.6m over a three-year cycle against a limit of £83m.

Bournemouth’s PSR loss would have been lower than their pre-tax one, but the allowable expenditure the club could claim would not have brought them even close to their £83m limit. The Premier League has previously punished Everton and Nottingham Forest with points deductions for breaching PSR.

The £71.4m was written off in December 2022, when Maxim Demin sold the club to American businessman Bill Foley’s Black Knight Football Club group. Ordinarily, shareholder loan write-offs, which the £71.4m between Demin and Bournemouth constituted before his sale of the club, are not counted when PSR compliance is calculated. The reason it was allowed to be written off from a PSR perspective here, and Bournemouth are not the only top-flight side to take advantage of this scenario, is because it is linked to the takeover transaction.

In that regard, it was deemed different to Demin not selling and writing off the £71.4m loan. It was ruled upon as an arms-length deal from a fair market value standpoint and a natural, albeit helpful, consequence for Bournemouth. The additional financial headroom created by the loan getting written off and counting towards their PSR calculation enabled Bournemouth to spend on players such as Dean Huijsen, Tyler Adams and Evanilson.

There are examples of Premier League clubs being sold with outstanding shareholder loans where this hasn’t happened.

Multiple sources, speaking on condition of anonymity to protect their positions, told The Athletic that the Premier League allowed Bournemouth to retain the loan write-off in their PSR calculation because it represented an arm’s length transaction (as part of the club sale) and so passed the league’s fair market value assessment protocol.

The transaction was deemed separate from an existing shareholder writing off a loan — a transaction the Premier League would ordinarily have clubs exclude from their PSR calculations — because it came about via a change of ownership. It appears one of the key points was that Demin writing off the loan after selling the club meant the transaction wasn’t officially a shareholder or related-party one, and represented, in effect, third-party income for PSR purposes. It is a timing distinction that could raise eyebrows across the top flight.

The Athletic has learnt this is not the first time a Premier League club have benefited from a change in ownership this way. It appears that if outgoing owners are happy for outstanding loans to be written off to the club’s profit and loss statement, the Premier League is happy for the club in question to enjoy the benefit of that write-off — no matter how significant that benefit may prove to be.

Given the transaction has been deemed exceptional by virtue of it coming about through a change in ownership, there seems limited scope for others to repeat this move. Only upon a sale would a club be able to benefit from a shareholder loan write-off, at least from a PSR perspective.

While PSR is, by definition, about encouraging sustainability in clubs, there has long been an underlying aim of stopping them gaining an unfair sporting advantage through breaching financial rules. Indeed, the premise of a PSR breach generating a sporting advantage formed a key plank of the Premier League’s legal battle with Everton last season, with the league — successfully — arguing their overspending had helped them on the pitch.

Across the 2022-23 and 2023-24 seasons, Bournemouth spent £271.1m on new players and recouped just £5.1m in player sales, a net spend of £266m. That was the fifth-highest net transfer spend in English football over those two years.

But Bournemouth broke no rules. Indeed, the Premier League was happy with the treatment applied in this instance.

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful. Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy). However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch. Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog