Skip to main content

Huddersfield need stability

Back in the 1920s Huddersfield were a leading club in English football.   Prime minister Harold Wilson (1964-70, 1974-76) was a declared supporter.

Huddersfield Town have had a pretty good start to the season, winning four of their first five games in League One.  The expectation is that they should be among the clubs challenging for promotion, especially as they are one of the bigger spenders in the division, splashing out £1.2m on striker Alfie May from Birmingham City, while bringing in quite a few players on free transfers (but on decent wages).

The club’s supporters will hope that this recruitment works out rather better than last season, when their £4.4m outlay was only bettered by Birmingham City’s record-breaking £30m gross spend. There was a lot of noise about Wrexham, but they were actually outspent by Town (at least according to Transfermarkt).

The main signing last season was Joe Taylor from Luton Town, but they also invested a fair bit in Dion Charles from Bolton Wanderers, Antony Evans from Bristol Rover, Lasse Sorenson from Lincoln City and Ruben Roosken from Heracles Almelo.

The fact that two of the top three spenders were promoted last season (as well as the sixth highest) shows that money really does talk in League One - though Town discovered that it’s not always a guarantee of success.

It’s fair to say that Huddersfield Town could do with a reversal in their fortunes, as the trend has not been their friend for a while. After spending two seasons in the Premier League (in 2017/18 and 2018/19), it’s been quite a fall from grace.

Indeed, as recently as 2021/22 Town enjoyed a fantastic season under Carlos Corberan, when they finished an impressive third in the Championship.  They secured a place in the play-offs, before losing to Nottingham Forest in the final.

However, the club was then relegated from the Championship to League One in 2023/24, which was the first time that Town had been in England’s third tier since 2011/12. Owner Kevin Nagle understandably described this as “extremely disappointing”.

Changes in manager and owner

Town have also not been helped by numerous changes in the manager in the last couple of years.  The latest man to be given an opportunity is Lee Grant, who had been first team coach at Ipswich Town, which means that the Terriers have had no fewer than eight managers since July 2022, not including caretakers.    this lack of continuity is hardly conducive to success on the pitch, as different playing styles have been adopted by each of the coaches.

Owner Nagle is an American businessman, mainly in pharmaceuticals, who acquired the club in March 2023. He is also owner of a couple of American sports teams: football club Sacramento Republic and basketball team Sacramento Kings.

Similar to managers, there has also been a great deal of change in the club’s ownership in the past few years, which is almost certainly another reason for Town’s issues.  Long standing custodian Dean Hoyle had sold a 75% stake in Huddersfield Town to Phil Hodgkinson’s Pure Sports Consultancy Ltd in 2019, but the new owner’s main business interests were placed into administration in November 2021. Although this did not directly affect the club, it did lead to the return of the former owner.

Hoyle stepped back in to oversee the day to day running of the club and “provide urgent financial support”, even though he was still the minority shareholder, though he had to once again take a step back in October 2022 on health grounds.  The transfer of Hodkinson’s 75% stake was finally completed in March 2023, so Hoyle once again held 100% of the shares, though he then immediately sold this 100% shareholding to Nagle.

Events on the pitch have not been great since Nagle’s arrival, but in fairness it was reported that the club might have entered administration without the takeover.

Financial lossees

In 2023/24, when Town finished 23rd in the Championship, the pre-tax loss more than doubled from (restated) £6.4m to £15.0m, as revenue was basically flat at £18.2m, while operating expenses rose £2.9m (8%) from £34.1m to £37.0m.

The increase in the operating loss was exacerbated by profit from player sales halving from £8.9m to £4.4m, while there was no repeat of the prior year’s £1.4m exceptional Items (mainly financing gains).

Very few clubs make money in the incredibly competitive Championship, so Town’s £15.0m loss was pretty normal for this division, despite the steep increase in the net loss. In fact, no fewer than nine clubs lost even more money, led by Leeds United £61m, Ipswich Town £39m and WBA £34m.

Town have now posted a loss three years in a row with the size of the deficit steadily increasing. In fact, they have lost money in four of the five seasons since relegation from the Premier League.  Nagle had said, “We are going to lose a lot of money, no question. That can’t be continuous and it isn't sustainable, but right now we are investing in the club and in the infrastructure.”  In fairness, Town had one of the best financial records in the Championship, “only” losing £33m in the five years before relegation, which was the fifth smallest loss (no clubs managed to generate a profit).

Town have partially offset their operating losses with £42m profit from player sales in the last five years, though £28m of this came in the first two years after relegation from the Premier League.

Town’s revenue very slightly increased in 2023/24 to £18.2m to break the sequence where this had fallen five years in row, though this has still dropped by £107m from the £125m peak in the Premier League. This was largely due to a £100m reduction in TV money, though both other revenue streams were also down, commercial by £6.1m and match day by £0.7m.

Revenue

As a result of the decline, Town’s £18.2m revenue was one of the lowest in the Championship in 2023/24, only above Preston North End £16.9m and Rotherham United £16.6m. Furthermore, it was miles below the parachute clubs, led by the three most recently relegated from the Premier League, namely Leeds United £128m, Leicester City £105m and Southampton £85m.  However, it’s also worth noting that Town’s revenue was less than half of some clubs without parachutes, e.g. Bristol City £42m, Sunderland £38m and Ipswich Town £37m.

Town only own 40% of the 24,500 capacity Accu Stadium (previously John Smith’s) via their stake in Kirklees Stadium Development Ltd, which operates the stadium and the surrounding 54-acre site. The rest is owned by the Huddersfield Giants rugby league club (20%) and the local council (40%).

Under a new agreement, the council is expected to give its 40% share to Town, which would give the football club 80%. However, this deal is unlikely to be completed until the Huddersfield Giants have planning permission on a new stadium site – in Huddersfield.

Despite the lack of revenue growth, Town’s wage bill actually rose £1.5m (7%) from £21.5m to £23.0m, as the club tried to remain competitive in the Championship.  Nevertheless, wages have been cut by around two-thirds (£41m) from the £64m peak, following relegation from the Premier League. They will have been even lower in League One, thanks to relegation clauses and the departure of some high earners.

Despite the increase in 2023/24, Town’s £23.0m wage bill was the fifth lowest in the Championship, so it’s not a major surprise that they struggled at the wrong end of the table, given the strong correlation between wages and league position.  The only clubs to pay less were Preston North End £22.0m, Sheffield Wednesday £21.8m, Plymouth Argyle £16.9m and Rotherham United £12.9m. 

With all of the changes in ownership and different treatment in the accounts, it’s quite difficult to calculate the owner funding, but based on information in the cash flow statement and the notes on related parties, it looks like a net £39m was provided in the last three years, including £16.9m in 2023/24.

The pluses and minuses

After memorably beating the odds by gaining promotion to the Premier League, Huddersfield Town have found the going tough after relegation from the top flight, especially once the parachute payments ended.  Given that they do not generate a great deal of money from their normal operations, this should not have come as a massive surprise.

On the bright side, Town are one of the better resourced clubs in League One, so they really should be in the promotion mix this season, especially after being more active in the transfer market with Nagle continuing to provide significant financial support.

The huge amount of change in the past couple of years at board level and on the coach’s bench has done them no favours, so the hope would be for a period of stability, which would surely help Town’s prospects of a return to the Championship, though League One can be an unforgiving division.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...