Top teams to lose betting firms as shirt sponsors

The first weekend of the Premier League season was also the beginning of an end. A new campaign that kicked off with Liverpool’s 4-2 win against Bournemouth on Friday will be the last to see gambling sponsors on the front of playing shirts, closing the book on over two decades of financial support.

More than half of the Premier League’s 20 clubs have a gambling firm as their primary sponsor and they soon must look elsewhere for solutions to a commercial shortfall that collectively runs to £100million ($135m).

There will still be the chance to display betting firms on the sleeves of kits, advertising boards and on training wear, but it is forecast that the value of some sponsorship deals could be halved in the next 12 months.

Eleven clubs — Aston Villa, Everton, West Ham United, Wolverhampton Wanderers, Nottingham Forest, Fulham, Crystal Palace, Brentford, Bournemouth, Burnley and Sunderland — are all having one last dance with a betting platform this season.

It has typically become the most lucrative option for those clubs outside of the ‘Big Six’ and, as such, difficult to turn down. Fulham, who were the first Premier League club to be sponsored by a bookmaker when partnering with Betfair in 2002, and Villa have teamed up with a total of seven different gambling companies. West Ham United, meanwhile, have been partnered with online bookmakers since 2015.

Pre-packaged deals have become commonplace for newly promoted clubs. Sunderland signed a deal with W88 in the weeks that followed promotion through the Championship play-offs, a company that had previously sponsored Villa, Wolves, Fulham, Leicester, Crystal Palace and Burnley.

Sleeve sponsorship deals, retaining a presence during matches, will still be permitted, as will partnerships to adorn training kit. A sleeve sponsor for a mid-table Premier League club has a value of between £1m and £2m, but as it proved with front-of-shirt partnerships, interest from betting companies is expected to drive that figure up significantly.

Relegation back to the Championship would allow any club to retain a partnership with a betting firm, as the EFL (sponsored itself by Sky Bet) continues to allow front-of-shirt arrangements, but it is the Premier League and its international exposure that has generated interest from the gambling industry.

Aston Villa, whose struggles to comply with financial fair play rules have been well-documented, will be another ambitious club with a front-of-shirt sponsor to find ahead of next season. Their two-year deal with Betano, thought to be worth £14m per season, will be difficult to replicate next season. The same extends to Everton’s partnership with Stake, one that was championed as a club-record deal when struck in 2022.

Where football finds its next big commercial partnerships is unclear. There is no common theme among the eight clubs with a non-gambling sponsor, aside from the finance industry, which backs Liverpool, Tottenham and Brighton & Hove Albion, and airlines, backers of Manchester City and Arsenal.

The branding of betting firms will remain evident in the Premier League next season, with inventories still stretching to advertising boards, interview backdrops and the sleeves of kits. It will still be big business.

I devoted a chapter of my book Political Football about football’s relationship with gambling and it was certainly something I was uneasy about, although I don’t want to stop people having a bet. The risk of greater regulation and taxation is an expansion of the black market.

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion. Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs. An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog