Skip to main content

FA lose legal battle with Forest

Once again the game's governing body has been made to look foolish.

The FA will be forced to pay Nottingham Forest hundreds of thousands of pounds after losing a landmark legal battle with the Premier League club.

Forest faced disciplinary proceedings after a 2-0 defeat by Everton in April last year — a game that included three disputed penalty appeals — having posting on X that they had warned referee chiefs that the VAR in the game, Stuart Attwell, was a fan of relegation rivals Luton Town.

But Forest then complained that the barrister appointed to chair the disciplinary panel had been “biased” against them after the club questioned the £1million fine being sought by the FA. Graeme McPherson KC had said at that hearing that he rejected “the club’s somewhat hysterical submission”.

To the embarrassment of the FA, lawyers have now found that McPherson’s comment could be viewed as an “unjustified, inappropriate, and personal attack on the club” after they were eventually fined £750,000 for the controversial tweet.

Forest had been charged with bringing the game into disrepute thanks to a post that was viewed nearly 40 million times, with McPherson appointed the chair of the FA panel which made the preliminary decision.

When Forest then launched an appeal against the fine, McPherson was selected by the FA to chair the appeal. However, Forest objected to that appointment because of his previous comments. In the end McPherson recused himself, citing “pre-existing commitments”.

However, in October Forest were then fined £125,000 for their part in a mass confrontation with Chelsea at Stamford Bridge, with their opponents also fined £40,000.  Forest appealed against that decision too, with McPherson once again named as the chair of the disciplinary panel.  The club argued that his appointment was inappropriate because of the “hysterical” comment and sought an arbitration hearing to resolve the matter.

The FA has not yet commented on the situation but a new chair of the panel for the appeal will now have to be appointed, with the FA footing the legal bill. It will have to pay the cost of the tribunal, which was £105,750 plus VAT, and both its own and Forest’s legal costs.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do