Skip to main content

FA lose legal battle with Forest

Once again the game's governing body has been made to look foolish.

The FA will be forced to pay Nottingham Forest hundreds of thousands of pounds after losing a landmark legal battle with the Premier League club.

Forest faced disciplinary proceedings after a 2-0 defeat by Everton in April last year — a game that included three disputed penalty appeals — having posting on X that they had warned referee chiefs that the VAR in the game, Stuart Attwell, was a fan of relegation rivals Luton Town.

But Forest then complained that the barrister appointed to chair the disciplinary panel had been “biased” against them after the club questioned the £1million fine being sought by the FA. Graeme McPherson KC had said at that hearing that he rejected “the club’s somewhat hysterical submission”.

To the embarrassment of the FA, lawyers have now found that McPherson’s comment could be viewed as an “unjustified, inappropriate, and personal attack on the club” after they were eventually fined £750,000 for the controversial tweet.

Forest had been charged with bringing the game into disrepute thanks to a post that was viewed nearly 40 million times, with McPherson appointed the chair of the FA panel which made the preliminary decision.

When Forest then launched an appeal against the fine, McPherson was selected by the FA to chair the appeal. However, Forest objected to that appointment because of his previous comments. In the end McPherson recused himself, citing “pre-existing commitments”.

However, in October Forest were then fined £125,000 for their part in a mass confrontation with Chelsea at Stamford Bridge, with their opponents also fined £40,000.  Forest appealed against that decision too, with McPherson once again named as the chair of the disciplinary panel.  The club argued that his appointment was inappropriate because of the “hysterical” comment and sought an arbitration hearing to resolve the matter.

The FA has not yet commented on the situation but a new chair of the panel for the appeal will now have to be appointed, with the FA footing the legal bill. It will have to pay the cost of the tribunal, which was £105,750 plus VAT, and both its own and Forest’s legal costs.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...
Post a Comment
Read more