Skip to main content

15 years of progress under FSG at Liverpool

It was October 15, 2010, when Fenway Sports Group, then known as New England Sports Ventures, completed its £300million takeover of Liverpool.  The debt-ridden Premier League giants had been pulled back from the brink of administration after the destructive reign of Tom Hicks and George Gillett. “I am proud and humbled,” principal owner John W Henry told reporters. “I can’t tell you how happy I am. We’re here to win.”

It took FSG time to get the right personnel and structure in place after the mess inherited from Hicks and Gillett.

This summer’s record-breaking spending spree, following last season’s title triumph, underlined how increasing revenues have allowed Liverpool to buy established, elite talent rather than untapped potential.

Liverpool’s total outlay was around £449m, including add-ons. No club in the Premier League era has ever spent more in one window, but they also generated up to £260m from sales.  “It’s been years in the making,” CEO Billy Hogan told The Athletic in July. “One of the things we’re constantly focused on is that ‘virtuous circle’. Trying to run the club in the right way to ensure that we can generate as much revenue as we can. That helps put more back into the team, which is incredibly important.”

It’s hard to overstate the mess the previous ‘custodians’ of the club — Hicks and Gillett — had created. There was £200m owed to the Royal Bank of Scotland, which could have put the club into administration.

If you look at the accounts of Liverpool then, it actually obscures the seriousness of the position because all the debt was in a holding company called Kop Football Holdings. But the only asset Kop Holdings had was Liverpool, so you can work out who was going to be on the hook for it. In two years of Kop Holdings, interest payments on the debt were £65m. In the 14 years under FSG, Liverpool have paid just £50m in interest payments.

FSG’s methods have been very different from some of its competitors. In the first five or six years, FSG put in around £170m to get the club on an even keel, and to rebuild the Main Stand at Anfield, but it hasn’t just poured in endless money. FSG’s decision-makers wanted Liverpool to be self-sustaining. For the most part, they have got them there.

There have been missteps, but there has been a professionalisation behind the scenes while not losing sight of the fact that Liverpool are still a football club. You can pinpoint a clear strategy throughout, which is harder at other clubs. It’s made more impressive when you consider that FSG hasn’t just poured in endless amounts of money every year.

After that initial £170m in the first six years, there was nothing really until 2023-24 when it sold a stake of between 1.9 per cent and 3.8 per cent to U.S. sports investment Dynasty Equity and put that money (£127.3m) into the club. Most of FSG’s investment has gone on infrastructure projects, such as redeveloping Anfield. That’s been frustrating to some fans but it is a lot healthier than sinking cash into transfers and wages.

Three years ago, FSG was briefly open to the possibility of selling up before opting to offload a small minority stake to Dynasty. Now the sale of an asset that has grown in value from around £300m in 2010 to more than £4billion is far from their thoughts. Sources close to the owners insist they are planning for the long term with Liverpool as part of their portfolio.

FSG also remains committed to buying a second football club in Europe, which it believes could help Liverpool recruit and develop young players. It was also key in tempting Edwards to return in March 2024. There was always an acceptance that it would be a case of waiting for the right opportunity rather than rushing into anything.

One of FSG’s greatest triumphs has been the redevelopment of Anfield. It was one of the biggest issues they inherited, but rebuilding both the Main Stand and Anfield Road Stand lifted capacity from 44,000 to 61,000. An iconic arena was modernised while retaining its history and tradition.

Close to £300m has been invested in the club’s infrastructure when you factor in building the new training ground, buying back and renovating the old Melwood centre for the women’s team, and the new club store at Anfield. The Athletic revealed last month that FSG has also committed to spending £20m on an extensive overhaul of the academy.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...