Skip to main content

Forest upgrade stadium plans

Nottingham Forest are using the architects who oversaw Liverpool’s recent expansion of Anfield to help with new-look plans to turn the City Ground into a stadium with a capacity of up to 45,000.

Three months after obtaining planning permission to start their home ground’s long-awaited redevelopment, Forest have now decided to shelve those designs in favour of a more ambitious overhaul of the stadium that has been their home, beside the River Trent, since 1898.

The Premier League club had previously intended to demolish the Peter Taylor Stand — the oldest, and smallest, of the City Ground’s four — and replace it with an entirely new structure, increasing capacity from just over 30,000 to around 35,000. Work was due to begin next year.

Among sweeping changes, however, the club have been exploring alternative proposals to remove the roof of the Peter Taylor, then build over the existing structure to turn it into one of the biggest stands in English football, tripling its number of seats to 15,000. To put it into context, that would be 1,500 more than the largest stand at Chelsea’s Stamford Bridge can hold. The new stand would be 58m (190ft) tall, whereas the previous application proposed one of 38m.

At the same time, Forest want to fill in the corners on either side of the Trent End, joining it up with the adjacent stands to provide around 5,000 more seats.

One of the more intriguing parts of Forest’s plans is that they are re-examining whether it is possible to construct a new Peter Taylor Stand around the existing structure without causing the disruption that would be involved if it were demolished at the start of the building work. This is the way it happened at Anfield, ensuring that capacity did not have to be dramatically reduced by the stadium being, in effect, only three-quarters operational on matchdays. 

Before anything, Forest have to again obtain planning permission, and that will be far from straightforward given the challenges they encountered before getting approval for their previous proposals.

The delays have been considerable and, though the idea was ultimately shelved, the club gave serious consideration at one stage to leaving the City Ground altogether for a new 50,000-capacity stadium at Toton, southwest of their home city on the Nottinghamshire-Derbyshire border. Instead, Forest have appointed property experts Savills to inform the relevant authorities they will be submitting a new planning application for their existing site.

No mention is made of a time frame or what would happen in the worst-case scenario of Forest, currently 17th in the 20-team table, being relegated from England’s top division this season or in the near future. However, that has also been a concern in two of their three previous campaigns and it has never impacted the desire at the top of the club to create what they see as being the biggest stadium in the East Midlands.

If Forest are to get consent once more, they will have to convince the authorities that the benefits outweigh the issues caused by a significant increase in spectator numbers and road traffic, bringing issues with pollution, parking and congestion in what is largely a residential area.

The club did briefly look into whether it might be feasible to follow Tottenham Hotspur’s example and build an entirely new stadium on their existing site. However, the decision at the time was that there was not enough space because of the restrictions caused by the neighbouring river.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do