Skip to main content

How much have managerial sackings cost United?

Manchester United have more than footballing reasons to bear in mind when considering whether or not to bring the Amorim experiment to an abrupt end. Sacking managers/head coaches costs money and, at United, financial concerns have been a prominent topic since Sir Jim Ratcliffe acquired a stake in the club in February 2024.

For almost 27 years from the late 1980s, United didn’t need to worry about what changing their manager would cost. Sir Alex Ferguson’s lengthy and wildly successful time in charge ensured any problems tended to reside away from the Old Trafford dugout. Much has changed since his 2013 retirement. Amorim is that dugout’s sixth permanent occupant in the subsequent 12 years.

All that flux comes at a price. Ferguson’s own departure, while plainly not a sacking, brought about £2.4million ($3.2m at the current rate) in costs to remove coaching staff not wanted by his successor, David Moyes. Just 10 months into a six-year deal, Moyes was out by the following April. Removing him and his own backroom team set United back £4.9m.  That was the cheapest of their recent sackings.

Louis van Gaal lasted two years in Moyes’ wake before his own ousting, with £8.4million the cost to remove the Dutchman and his assistants. Next came Jose Mourinho, whose December 2018 dismissal netted him and his entourage £19.6m (the largest managerial payout in United’s history). Ole Gunnar Solskjaer (£9.1m) and Erik ten Hag (£10.4m) hardly left for pennies either, not least because the latter was dismissed less than four months after United triggered a one-year extension to his contract.

The big uncertainty is Ralf Rangnick, who was appointed as interim manager when Solskjaer went, with a two-year consultancy role lined up for the German once that 2021-22 season ended. He never took up the latter position, but his departure in May 2022 coincided with a further £14.7million in compensation costs landing on United’s books.

Per information briefed by the club at the time, that £14.7million was not exclusively paid to Rangnick and his team. Instead, elements of it went on wider staffing changes within both football and non-football departments at United. The exact amount paid to the German and his staff upon departure is therefore unknown.

The cost to United of sacking managers over the years stands at £54.9million. On its own, for a club of their stature, that’s not a huge amount: less than one per cent of revenues since Ferguson stepped down just over 12 years ago.

 The cost of Ten Hag’s departure was accompanied by the £4.1million United shelled out to remove sporting director Dan Ashworth after just five months in post. Taken together, the costs to remove Ashworth, Ten Hag and the latter’s assistants were equal to two-fifths of the costs incurred on staffing changes at United last season. When it comes to football personnel, one or two mistakes have a big impact.

United shed £51.5million from their wage bill in 2024-25, a big (14 per cent) drop reflective of 176 staff being removed from administrative posts, itself a 22 per cent reduction in headcount. Yet those football sackings ate up 28 per cent of their wage bill savings, and came at a time when the club is still incurring the costs of its sizeable downsizing.

Other payments for loss of office and restructuring and redundancy have hit United’s bottom line to the tune of £34.5million since Ratcliffe arrived and while savings will be felt without the impact of dismissal costs in the future, it still stands that the club could do without expensive errors limiting the positives.

Sacking Amorim and his backroom team would bring further immediate costs. How much is unclear, but with the Portuguese’s contract not due to expire until June 2027, the amounts won’t be miserly, but some would argue that sacking him would pay for itself in better performance.

No European-football income this season is a contributing factor to United already projecting a small drop in revenues in 2025-26, at a time when rivals’ turnover is surging. Those projections include a minimum Premier League finish, too. Fail to achieve that and there’ll be another financial hit.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...