Skip to main content

Still a long way to go before Juventus break even

Juventus’ 2024/25 accounts cover a season when they finished fourth in Serie A, thus qualifying for the Champions League, but only thanks to an away win against Venezia on the last day of the season. Coming fourth was not too bad, but Juventus have struggled by their own lofty standards in the last five years, given that they had won the league no fewer than nine seasons in a row before that.

Juventus’ pre-tax loss significantly reduced from €196m to €50m, as revenue rose €68m (18%) from €372m to €440m and profit from player sales almost quadrupled from €23m to €90m. Although the substantial reduction in the pre-tax loss is obviously good news, the fact is that Juventus still lost €50m before tax, which is hardly small change.  Looking at the latest published results, which are a mixture of the 2023/24 and 2024/25 seasons, Juve’s loss was still one of the worst in Serie A, only smaller than Roma €76m, Parma €64m and Monza €54m.

In the three years up to 2023/24, the “Old Lady” lost a massive €551m, compared to much smaller losses of €394m at Roma, €240m at Inter and €34m at Milan, while Napoli actually made a profit of €143m.  The last time that Juventus posted a profit was back in 2016/17, so they have now lost money eight years in succession. In that period, they have lost an incredible €944m before tax, including €826m in the last five years alone.

The main driver for the revenue growth was a return to the Champions League and participation in the FIFA Club World Cup, which led to a big increase in broadcasting, up €77m (78%) from €100m to €177m. Ticket sales also benefited from playing in Europe, rising €7m (13%) from €58m to €65m.  On the other hand, commercial dropped €26m (13%) from €203m to €177m, mainly due to the lack of a shirt sponsor.

One of the main reasons for Juventus’ lower loss was a big increase in the profit from player sales from €23m to €90m, including Matias Soulè to Roma, Dean Huijsen to Bournemouth, Federico Chiesa to Liverpool, Moise Kean to Fiorentina and Kalo Jorge to Cruzeiro.   Based on the latest results, this was the highest profit from player sales in Italy, ahead of Atalanta €71m, Napoli €71m, Inter €65m and Torino €58m.

Based on 2023/24 results, Juventus were 16th in the Deloitte Money League, which ranks clubs globally by revenue. This was their lowest placing on record, as they were even overtaken by Newcastle United.  To underline the extent of their decline, Juventus actually had the second highest revenue in the world back in 2002/03. This was €85m more than the club ranked tenth, but in 2023/24 they were €177m below 10th place, i.e. a swing of more than a quarter of a billion Euros.

As we have seen, Europe TV money is extremely important for Juventus, especially as the new format has delivered a 20% uplift in central distributions.  Therefore, their return to the Champions League last season was obviously good news, earning them €64m (per the Swiss Ramble’s model) for reaching the knockout round, split between participation payment €18.6m, prize money €14.4m and value pillar €31.4m.

Juve’s match day revenue lags behind almost all of the European elite, e.g. in 2023/24 eight clubs generated more than €100m, led by Real Madrid €248m, Paris Saint-Germain €170m, Arsenal €153m and Manchester United €152m.  Juve are miles below other leading European clubs commercially, where four generated more than twice as much income in 2023/24, namely Real Madrid €482m, Bayern Munich €421m, Barcelona €421m and Manchester City €407m.

Wages

Juventus’ wage bill decreased for the fourth year in a row, falling by €19m (7%) from €264m to €245m, their lowest since 2015/16. Wages for players and technical staff were cut from €239m to €220m, while other staff was slightly down from €25m to €24m.  This means that wages have been cut by a staggering €95m (28%) from the €340m peak in 2020/21.

The steep decline in Juve’s wage bill helps explain why they have found life more difficult on the pitch in recent years. Since 2018/19 their wages have dropped €83m, while all of their rivals have increased wages in this time, with the exception of Napoli, and their decrease was much smaller than Juventus.  Despite this decrease, Juve’s €245m wage bill remains the highest in Italy, though the gap to other clubs has significantly reduced.

Juve’s wage bill is a lot less than some of their European peers, with three clubs paying at least €200m more than them, namely PSG €659m, Manchester City €480m and Real Madrid €469m. Another six clubs enjoyed an advantage of more than €100m.

One of the root causes of Juve’s large losses is the amount they have splashed out in the transfer market, which can be seen in a comparison with other leading clubs.  For example, in the five years up to 2023/24, they had the seventh highest gross spend in Europe with €907m, only comfortably surpassed by Chelsea.

Debt and funding

Juventus’ gross debt increased by €60m from €279m to €339m, as bank loans rose €33m from €51m to €84m and the amounts owed to factoring companies was up €30m from €215m to €245m.

Juventus have been very reliant on capital injections from their owners and there is little sign of this stopping any time soon, as the club has proposed another €110m increase, of which the shareholder Exor already made a €30m down payment last season.  This is the fourth time that the club has had to go to the shareholders for cash in the last six years, following €300m in 2019/20, €400m in 2021/22 and €200m in 2023/24, which means that the owners have provided a cool billion Euros in this time.

In fairness, this is not unusual for leading Italian clubs, though Juventus have needed more support from their owners than the others, e.g. they received €889m in the six years up to 2023/24, compared to €647m at Roma and €600m at Milan.

This set of financial results is still far from great, but it marks a distinct improvement on the massive losses made in the last few years, supported by the return to the Champions League (and participation in the FIFA Club World Cup), allied with strong player sales.

Juventus are clearly making big efforts to lower costs, as evidenced by the steep reductions in both wages and player amortisation, but there is still a long way to go before they can get to break-even. Furthermore, they will still need some fancy footwork to comply with UEFA’s financial regulations, which is really important, as playing in Europe is vital to Juve’s business model.

More data and information on the Swiss Ramble’s Substack platform published from Zurich.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...