Skip to main content

Norwich should be doing better given spend

Majority control at Norwich City passed to Attanasio’s Norfolk Holdings group from Delia Smith and Michael Wynn Jones after 28 years.

Attanasio, the owner of American baseball team Milwaukee Brewers, first purchased a minority 22% stake from former director Michael Foulger in September 2022, before increasing his shareholder to 40.4% in April 2024.  In March 2025 Attanasio converted his loans into equity, giving him 85% of the football club. Smith and her husband have retained 10%, while the remaining 5% is owned by independent shareholders, including the supporters’ group,

Under the former owners, the club had been promoted to the top flight on no fewer than five occasions, but they had become the classic “yo-yo” club, most notably in the four seasons between 2018/19 and 2021/22, when they were twice finished top of the Championship, only to twice come last in the Premier League.

Norwich City’s pre-tax loss in 2024/25 widened from £14.4m to £20.7m, mainly due to a steep reduction in revenue, which dropped £33.8m (46%) from £73.1m to £39.3m, reports the Swiss Ramble.

The main driver of Norwich’s revenue decrease was, of course, broadcasting, which fell £32.7m (73%) from £44.7m to £12.0m, after parachute payments ceased. However, the other revenue streams were also lower, as gate receipts declined £0.7m (7%) from £11.3m to £10.6m, while commercial was down £0.4m (3%) from £17.1m to £16.7m.  Norwich limited the operational damage with player sales, where profit significantly increased from £13.4m to £23.2m.

It is clear that Norwich’s £21m loss is one of the worst in the Championship, as only four clubs lost more in 2023/24, namely Leeds United £61m, Ipswich Town £39m, WBA £34m and Stoke City £26m.

Norwich have long been regarded as a club that tries to operate sustainably, posting a profit in seven of the ten seasons up to 2020/21. However, they have lost money in all four years since then, adding up to £86m in that period.   This is mainly because they loosened the purse strings, investing a relatively large amount in the squad, both in terms of transfers and wages, though ironically this has only resulted in worse performances on the pitch.

The £39m revenue in 2024/25 is the club’s lowest for six years, i.e. since the last time they did not have parachute payments.

Norwich’s average attendance increased slightly from 26,104 to 26,316, which was only 3% lower than the 27,005 peak in the Premier League. The club said that it had well over 21,000 season ticket holders (including hospitality).

Despite the significant reduction in revenue, Norwich’s wage bill was only cut £4m (7%) from £52m to £48m, as the club tried to remain competitive in the Championship.   However, since relegation from the Premier League, wages have been cut by around 60% (£70m) from the £118m peak.

In the three years since Attanasio arrived, there has been a clear change in the funding model, as the £119m available cash was very largely provided by the shareholders.   This was mainly used to repay £56m external loans, cover £38m operating losses, invest £13m in infrastructure and pay £8m interest.

The latest accounts reveal the devastating impact of losing parachute payments on revenue, which underlines the importance of player trading and funding from the owner.

To date, Attanasio has shown a willingness to put his hand in his pocket, facilitating much investment into the squad and covering losses, but a £115m bill in just three years would probably not have been in the owner’s plans when he started building his stake in the club.

There is no doubt that Norwich should be doing better, given the amount of money they have spent, which is only really behind the (recently) relegated clubs.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do