Skip to main content

The cost of relegation for West Ham

West Ham are in a relegation battle.  No one gains financially from demotion, but it impacts some more than others. Existing cost bases play a big part, likewise a team’s ability to generate money by selling some faces that didn’t look out of place in the top tier.

Beyond that, club owners come into play. Between 2015 and 2024, Championship clubs lost a collective £3.2billion, all of it (and a little more) funded by benevolent shareholders. Amounts required for recently relegated clubs can vary, but a general rule is that the longer you stay in the second tier, the more you’ll need to lean on an owner or two.

One thing is for certain — if relegation comes, West Ham’s revenue will drop. That has been the case pretty much since the Premier League’s inception, but it has become more pronounced since 2016, when a new TV deal exploded onto the scene.

Since then, only one club has seen post-relegation turnover fall by less than a third. That was Bournemouth in 2020-21, and even that was only because of the Covid-19 pandemic pushing seven of the club’s 38 Premier League games into the subsequent accounting year. On average, club revenues after relegation have fallen by 46 per cent.

That fall is principally driven by a reduction in broadcast income, even as relegated clubs enjoy the benefit of parachute payments, which far outstrip the TV earnings of their new Championship peers.

What West Ham will receive in Premier League earnings this season is unknowable currently, but last season’s floor, for bottom side Southampton, was £109.2million.

Post-relegation, clubs enjoy those parachute payments to ease the burden, but the drop-off is steep. Last season, a first-year parachute payment totalled £49m. The amount for Leeds United, in their second year in the Championship, was £40m and, had there been a club in receipt of a third-year payment (there wasn’t), they’d have received £17.8m.

Championship clubs, including recently relegated ones, receive a ‘Basic Award’ payment from the EFL, too, though that was just £5.4m last season and has only increased marginally since. In other words, TV income now halves upon relegation.

In the past decade, commercial revenues at relegated clubs have dropped by an average of 42 per cent. While the figures vary noticeably from club to club (the median drop is actually higher, at 46 per cent), even the most commercially astute have been unable to avoid losing revenue.

West Ham’s commercial income of £58m is the Premier League’s ninth-highest, so while a fall would be likely upon relegation, it may be that, like Leeds, they’d still be able to generate significantly more than Championship peers.

The London Stadium is the third-largest ground in the Premier League, only trailing the homes of Manchester United and Spurs. West Ham have routinely filled it since moving in as tenants in 2016, and while it’s uncertain if that would remain the case in the second tier, the deal the club got upon signing a 99-year lease would ensure the stadium isn’t a weight around West Ham’s neck like it might be for other sides with huge homes if they went down.

In terms of their biggest costs, West Ham’s wage bill had been static for years, but leapt to a club record £161m in 2023-24, a rise of £24.1m and 18 per cent in one year. For a long time, many Premier League clubs have included relegation wage cuts in player contracts, and a West Ham source confirmed they are no different in doing so. Yet even if those cuts offset revenue reductions, which isn’t a guarantee, the club’s underlying operating loss means other funds, likely from player sales, would need to be found.

Owner funding has been relatively thin on the ground at West Ham, save for when Daniel Kretinsky bought into the club in November 2021. That saw £123.5m in shares issued, but around half of it went on repaying existing owner loans, and no shareholder funding arrived between then and the end of May 2024, when the latest available accounts end.

West Ham won’t go bust from relegation, but nor will they want to countenance the strain it would impose. It would be better to avoid it altogether. Beating Burnley on Saturday afternoon looks an essential step toward that goal.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...