Skip to main content

It's grand to be at Sussex by the sea

Yesterday’s FA Cup result at Old Trafford said something about the relative states of Brighton and Manchester United, one club on an upward trajectory,  the other sinking into a Slough of Despind.  Here are some extracts from the Swiss Ramble’s assessment of Brighton, much more in depth analysis on his Substack page.

Tony Bloom outlined the club’s approach, “We want to be a sustainable football club. We will have seasons where we lose a lot of money, as well as some seasons where we make a lot of money. But over time, if we stay in the Premier League, we will be sustainable and we will be profitable.”

However, the owner added, “Most of our rivals are not. So it’s really tough to compete with that.”

Player sales model

Brighton have now made a staggering £351m from player sales in the last four years, which is a dramatic change in approach, e.g. in the previous eight years their profits from this activity were only £29m

In the three seasons up to 2023/24, only two clubs in the Premier league generated more profit from player sales than Brighton’s £294m, namely Chelsea £339m and Manchester City £328m. These three clubs were at least £100m higher than the rest of the league.   In fact, the Albion made more than Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester United combined.

Excluding money from the New Monks Farm project, Brighton’s revenue has increased by £79m (55%) from the 2018/19 pre-pandemic level of £143m to £222m. All three revenue streams have increased in this time with broadcasting the main driver, rising £38m to £151m, though commercial has nearly quadrupled from £11m to £43m, while match day is up 50% to £28m.

As a sign of how far Brighton have come, they had the 21st highest revenue in the world in 2023/24, according to the Deloitte Money League.  This is their highest ever ranking, two places better than the previous season, putting them ahead of clubs like Napoli, Roma, Eintracht Frankfurt and Benfica.

Wages

Brighton’s wage bill significantly increased by £19m (13%) from £146m to £165m, which is a new club record, due to investment in the squad, bonuses for the 8th placed finish in the Premier League (and 5th in the WSL) and an increase in employer NI costs.  This means that wages have more than doubled from the first season in the Premier League in 2017/18, while they are up £50m (43%) in the last four years alone.

Following last season’s rise, Brighton’s £165m wage bill is currently 10th highest in the Premier League, i.e. the same as their revenue ranking.  However, for some perspective, the top four clubs all paid at least twice as much, namely Manchester City £408m, Liverpool £386m, Chelsea £338m and Arsenal £328m.

In the last ten years Brighton’s available cash has come from a variety of sources: £375m from player sales, £278m from the owner and £104m from operating activities.  This has largely been spent on £585m player purchases and £133m investment into infrastructure, while the cash balance has increased by £34m.

Brighton have invested significant sums in infrastructure, adding up to a hefty £286m since 2008/09, as they built a new stadium and training ground.

The Bloom effect

Bythe Swiss Ramble’s reckoning, Bloom has provided nearly half a billion Pounds to Brighton via £406m of loans and £88m of share capital (including £30m loans converted into equity).   The Zurich-based guru says: ‘By anyone’s standards, Bloom has been a fantastic owner, not just for his vision and ability to execute on his plans, but also his financial support.’

The Swiss Ramble concludes, ‘Although a £56m pre-tax loss is never going to be great news, the pain is softened when it follows a massive £208m of profits in the previous two years.  To a large extent, the club had to spend big, setting new club records for transfers and wages, as it pushed to keep pace with wealthier clubs.

The business model is reliant on player trading, so a reduction in profits from player sales last season contributed to the loss. There’s always a danger here, as the well can run dry (see Southampton), but Brighton are canny operators.

Brighton are fortunate to have an owner like Tony Bloom, who has provided the substantial funding and data smarts that have enabled the club to become a mainstay in England’s top flight.’

That said, Bloom is aware that the club cannot afford to rest on its laurels, “We have to always look to improve and innovate. If we stand still - and this is talked about in a lot of businesses, but is particularly true in football, and particularly in the Premier League - our competitors are fiercely competitive, and they are looking to overtake us. They are trying to get stronger all the time, so we have to do likewise, and ideally we’re going ahead even faster than the other teams.”

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...