Skip to main content

Spurs have to pay players more rather than sacking managers

The Financial Times has the last word on the challenges facing Spurs:

'Spurs rank ninth in Deloitte’s list of the world’s richest clubs, with revenues of €673mn, short of Manchester United but ahead of Chelsea. The club’s net transfer spend over five years is about €666mn, according to Transfermarkt, below Manchester United, Arsenal and Chelsea but higher than Liverpool.

The futuristic Tottenham Hotspur Stadium — which could be mistaken for a space ship that has inexplicably landed in N17 — is the second largest club ground in England. But the cavernous bowl served only to amplify the boos that rang out on Tuesday, as defeat to Newcastle United brought Frank’s tenure to an end. Croatian Igor Tudor has reportedly agreed to take over as interim boss until the end of the season.

There is one key metric where Tottenham lag behind: wages. Staff costs of £222mn in the 2023-24 season, the latest figures available, were by far the lowest of England’s “Big Six” clubs, and lower than Aston Villa, according to Football Benchmark

While Postecoglou may fall into the category of a disgruntled former employee, the Australian did not pull his punches when quizzed this week on whether Tottenham had a limit on salaries.

“When you look at the expenditure, particularly in their wage structure, they’re not a big club,” he told YouTube channel The Overlap, comments that will have Spurs fans in the stadium microbrewery spitting out their beers. “When we were trying to sign players, we weren’t in the market,” he added.

Postecoglou revealed that after finishing fifth in 2024, he wanted to kick on by signing the likes of Pedro Neto, now with Chelsea, Bryan Mbeumo, who has switched to Manchester United, as well as Marc Guéhi and Antoine Semenyo, who both moved recently to Manchester City. Instead, he said, he got Dominic Solanke “and three teenagers”.

No one single factor determines the success or failure of a football team. But the available research has consistently shown that a club’s wage bill is the biggest indicator of where a team is likely to finish in the league table. Miracles (Leicester City) do happen, but not consistently. And some clubs (Manchester United) are capable of wasting large sums on disappointing talent. But paying players more is the the biggest indicator of where a team is likely to finish in the league table. Miracles (Leicester City) do happen, but not consistently. And some clubs (Manchester United) are capable of wasting large sums on disappointing talent. But paying players more is the most reliable way to improve a team’s chances.

Tottenham are a top-class revenue generator, with a strong brand, a storied history, England’s best stadium and a large international fan base. But evidence suggests that, until they dare to spend top dollar on wages, their managerial merry-go-round will keep spinning.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...